Pseudomonas strains and their metabolites to control plant diseases

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure concerns methods of using novel bacterial strains of 0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328, the cell broth and novel metabolites produced from the bacterial strains, that can inhibit the growth of a variety of microbial species for a variety of crops. The methods include use of novel, potent antimicrobial metabolites produced from the strains corresponding to compounds having Formulas (I), (II), and (III):

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention is in the field of biopesticides. In particular, the invention pertains to seven novel strains of Pseudomonas spp, 0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328, the cell broth and novel metabolites produced from the bacterial strain that can inhibit the growth of a variety of microbial species. The Pseudomonas strains of 0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328 have been deposited in the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and have ATCC accession number PTA-126796, PTA-126797, PTA-126798, PTA-126799, PTA-126800, PTA-126801, and PTA-126802, respectively.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Plant diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms are exponentially increasing and cost-consuming. The plant pathogenic organisms include fungus, bacterium, mycoplasma, virus, viroid, nematode, or parasitic flowering plant. Currently, there are 14 common plant diseases caused by bacterial organisms including bacterial spot, bacterial light and bacterial wilt etc. Fire blight (Erwinia amylovora), citrus cankers [Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac)], bacterial leaf spot (BLS) [Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatora (XV-16)], olive knot [Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. Savastanoi (Psv)]. and soft root (Dickeya dadantii, Pectobacterium parmentieri Pectobacterium atrosepticum, and Pectobacterium carotovorum) are destructive plant diseases. Nationally, the costs of control fire blight are estimated at over $100 million (Norelli et al. (2003)). For citrus cankers, in Florida alone, costs of running an eradication program from 1995 through 2005 plus compensation to commercial growers and homeowners for residential citrus destroyed is approaching $1 billion.

Fire blight is a devastating disease of pome fruit resulting from the infection of a gram-negative bacterium Erwinia amylovora which impacts pear and apple in many parts of the world such as Europe, Germany, Austria and Switzerland (Chen et al. (2009)). While fire blight rarely kills an entire orchard, the disease and its control still cause significant economic losses. In the Pacific Northwest and northern California, there have been minor outbreaks annually since 1991 with at least some areas experiencing major outbreaks every 3 to 4 years. Even minor disease outbreaks can be costly as pruning to remove infected plant parts leads to disfigured trees with reduced future productivity. For example, a 10% incidence of rootstock blight in a 4-year old apple orchard can result in losses up to $3,500 per acre (Norelli et al. (2003)).

Microbial natural products have provided rich amounts of biological compounds as pesticides (Gwinn (2018)). However, current prevention methods for the bacterial plant diseases have limited effectiveness. The antibiotics streptomycin sulfate (FireWall, AgroSource, Inc.) and oxytetracycline hydrochloride (FireLine, AgroSource, Inc.) have been the primary products used to combat E. amylovora when infection risk is high. Because these compounds are also used in the management of human and animal health, use of these same antibiotics in crop agriculture can be controversial (Stockwell (2012)). For streptomycin sulfate, the concerns over antibiotic resistance has limited its use (Vrancken et al. (2013)). Another antibiotic that is being researched against fire blight is kasugamycin. One disadvantage is the frequent dosages of kasugamycin lead to phytotoxic effects that destroy the plant (Adaskaveg et al. (2010)). The other disadvantage is the high cost of kasugamycin in comparison to other antibiotics. So, kasugamycin needs to be paired with an assortment of other antibiotics.

In the last few decades, numerous non-antibiotic products have been developed, registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Organic Program (NOP)-approved, and marketed to orchardists for fire blight control (Tianna et al. (2018)). Historically, two products based on Bacillus subtilis have been registered for fire blight control in Europe: Serenade®, based on strain QST 713 and Biopro®, based on strain BD 170 (Broggini et al. (2005)). Spore-forming Bacillus based bioformulations offer advantages for biocontrol due to their long-lasting viability (Haas et al. (2005)). Moderate success of the two Bacillus based bioformulations has been demonstrated in numerous field trials in the USA and Germany (Aldwinckle et al. (2002); Kunz et al. (2011); Laux et al. (2003)). This suggests possible potential of Bacillus sp. in control of blossom infections by E. amylovora. However, Bacillus only works under low infection pressure. It fails under moderate and high infection pressure situations. Results obtained were erratic regarding both bioproducts, varying between 71% and 0% disease suppression (Broggini et al. (2005)).

Prospective biological protection products must on the one hand, effectively compete with E. amylovora, and on the other must be able to colonize the same niches on different organs of target plants. Protective bacteria produce secondary metabolites that affect the pathogen and compete for food and space, preventing pathogenesis by E. amylovora in relation with the plant. In this matter, the bacteria from the genus Pseudomonas fit into the biological protection factors described above (Haas et al. (2005)). Analysis of the species composition of colonizing bacteria of various plants showed widespread occurrence of fluorescent bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas.

In France, it was found that Pseudomonas spp. were the dominant component of populations inhabiting both healthy and diseased apple trees, pear and hawthorn and many of them showed the ability to limit the growth of E. amylovora in vitro (Paulin et al. (1978)). However, little information of the potent metabolites was reported.

In California, Thomson et al. (1976) selected three fluorescent Pseudomonas which were effective in pear blossom protection (Thomson et al. (1976)). In the mid-1980s, P. fluorescens strain A506 isolated from pear tree leaves in California showed distinctive activity in limiting the growth of E. amylovora and protective abilities to protect apple and pear against fireblight (Lindow et al. (1996)). The product BlightBan® A506 containing P. fluorescens has been developed, available on the market since 1996. Many experiments carried out in the states of California, Oregon and Washington demonstrated the usefulness of this preparation in various apple and pear protection programs (Johnson (2000)).

In England, two isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens were used in the protection of flowers and shoots of hawthorn (Wilson et al. (1992)).

In Italy and New Zealand, the suitability of two strains of the genus Pseudomonas, with the symbols BO 3371 and BO G19 were investigated (Galasso et al. (2002)). In greenhouse conditions they are highly effective in protecting flowers, as well as shoots of apple and pear. For example, the relative protection of strain BO3371 on pear shoots can reach to 87% (Galasso et al. (2002)). However, the results obtained were not always consistent, what could be related to the susceptibility of flowers bound with the length of the period from their opening to the end of flowering.

In New Zealand, the fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. IPV-BO G19 strain protected 79% apple blossoms in field conditions. In another experimental orchard, when sprayed 24 hours before inoculation with E. amylovora on ‘Braeburn’ apple flowers, the fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. IPV-BO G19 and IPV-BO 3371 reduced fire blight incidence by 78% and 58%, respectively (Biondi et al. (2006)).

In Spain, the strain EPS62e P. fluorescens significantly limited fire blight in tests on apple blossoms, pear fruit and pear blossoms in field assay. The improvement on fitness and efficacy of P. fluorescens EPS62e to fight fire blight was obtained by a strategy to combine nutritional enhancement and osmoadaptation. The field treatments with physiologically improved P. fluorescens EPS62e on pear blossom generated the efficiency can be as high as 90%, however, results differed depending on the test (Cabrefiga et al. (2011); Mikiciński et al. (2020)).

In Poland, 47 colonies of bacteria that were able to reduce the effects of fire blight on pear fruitlets have been isolated from the apple phyllosphere and soil (Mikiciński et al. (2008)).

The metabolites produced by gram-negative Pseudomonas species have been comprehensively reviewed (Masschelein et al. (2017)). The types of Pseudomonas metabolites can be classified as phenolic compounds, phenazine, lipopeptides, etc. Function of Pseudomonas species and their metabolites include the following (Alsohim et al. (2014)): 1) Produce hormones or induce systemic resistance; 2) Many naturally occurring strains also significantly improve plant growth (Plant growth regulator, IAA, viscosin); 3) Antagonism can be conferred by the production of siderophores and of surfactants, such as viscosin and viscosinamide, as well as antimicrobial compounds, such as hydrogen cyanide, phenazines, pyrrolnitrin or 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG). In our work, the bacterial strains were identified, the fermentates and novel metabolites were produced from the bacteria; specifically RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B, show higher potency on multiple pathogenic microbes including bacteria and fungi that have not been reported.

There is a need for new biopesticides derived from novel strains, cell broths and novel metabolites produced from such strains that can inhibit the growth of a variety of crop disease-causing pathogens.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In a first aspect, a method of growing bacteria to enhance production of protective metabolites is provided. The method includes alternative steps. In one method, a step of growing Pseudomonas bacteria in liquid media in a vessel to produce a bacterial fermentate is provided. The ratio of media volume to vessel volume is between about 1:2 and 1:10 and the vessel is shaken at a rate between about 100 and 250 RPM. According to an alternate step, the method includes growing Pseudomonas bacteria in liquid media in a fermenter to produce a bacterial fermentate. The air flow rate of the fermenter is between about 1 and 3 L/min. The concentration of dissolved oxygen is between 5 mg/L to 12 mg/L.

In a second aspect, an agricultural composition comprising the bacterial fermentate or the protective supernatant is provided. The agricultural composition is produced according to the method of the first aspect and any of the respects disclosed with regard to the first aspect. In a first respect, the agricultural composition further includes adjuvants. In this regard, the adjuvant is a surfactant.

In a third aspect, a method of controlling bacterial crop diseases is provided. The method includes several steps. A first step includes producing an agricultural composition comprising the bacterial fermentate or the protective supernatant produced by the first aspect or any of respects thereof. A second step includes applying said agricultural composition to crops to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms.

In a fourth aspect, a method of controlling bacterial crop diseases is provided. The method includes one step. A step includes applying an agricultural composition comprising between about 1.0×10⁵ and 1.0×10⁹ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria to crops to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms.

In a fifth aspect, a method of purifying protective metabolites from Pseudomonas bacteria is provided. The method includes several steps. A first step includes producing a bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant by the method of the first aspect and the respects thereof. A second step includes extracting the bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant by solvent mixtures with similar polarities or characters. A third step includes producing an eluate containing protective metabolites by eluting the bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant using a mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate or by eluting the bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant using mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate.

In a sixth aspect, an agricultural composition comprising protective metabolites from Pseudomonas bacteria purified by the method of the fifth aspect and respects thereof.

In a seventh aspect, a method of controlling bacterial crop diseases is provided. The method includes several steps. A first step includes producing an agricultural composition comprising protective metabolites from Pseudomonas bacteria purified by the method of the fifth aspect or any of the respects thereof. A second step includes applying said agricultural composition that the formulation of the protective supernatant or its metabolites can be solution (SL), soluble powder (SP), soluble granules (SG) and encapsulated formulation. In addition, the agricultural composition of the formulation of bacteria fermentate and cells can be suspension concentrate (SC), wettable powder (WP), and water dispersible granule (WG).

In an eighth aspect, a crystalline compound selected from one of the following structures:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates exemplary plot of the maximum likelihood phylogeny of representative Pseudomonas lineages based on a concatenated alignment of 16S rDNA, gyrB, rpoB and rpoD. The bootstrap support values were labeled below the four internal branches that received <100% support. Those not labeled represent 100% support.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example of assay-guided isolation of ethyl acetate extract of strain 0617-T307.

FIG. 3A depicts exemplary culture plots showing the amount of RejuAgro A in a shaking flask fermentation in which the distribution of RejuAgro A in the cell broth, supernatant and cells.

FIG. 3B depicts an exemplary plot of the production of RejuAgro A from cell fermentation over time.

FIG. 4 depicts exemplary agar plates showing V. inaequalis can grow on PDA plates with PDA alone without additives (plate A); with 0.25% 0.01M PBS (plate B) or 0.8% DMSO (plate C) or 1.6% DMSO (plate D) on day 14.

FIG. 5 depicts exemplary agar plates showing V. inaequalis cannot grow on PDA plates containing the selected four biocontrol bacteria (plate A: 0617-T307; plate B: 0118-T319; plate C: 0318-T327; plate D: 0418-T328) on day 14.

FIG. 6 depicts exemplary agar plates showing V. inaequalis cannot grow on PDA plates containing 40-80 μg/mL RejuAgro A on day 14 (plate A: 10 μg/mL in PDA plate; plate B: 20 μg/mL in PDA plate; plate C: 40 μg/mL in PDA plate; plate D: 80 μg/mL in PDA plate).

FIG. 7 depicts exemplary agar plates showing V. inaequalis can grow on PDA plates containing 10-80 μg/mL RejuAgro B on day 14 (plate A: 10 μg/mL in PDA plate; plate B: 20 μg/mL in PDA plate; plate C: 40 μg/mL in PDA plate; plate D: 80 μg/mL in PDA plate).

FIG. 8 depicts exemplary agar plates showing V. inaequalis can grow on PDA plates containing 200-1000 μg/mL copper sulfate on day 14 (plate A: PDA plate with 500 μg/mL CuSO₄; plate B: PDA plate with 1000 μg/mL CuSO₄).

FIG. 9 depicts an exemplary amount-peak area curve of RejuAgro A analyzed by HPLC at the wavelength of 407 nm.

FIG. 10 depicts exemplary data on RejuAgro A production from different bacterial strains.

FIG. 11 depicts an exemplary antifungal assay against Botrytis cinerea CA17, wherein panel A depicts (1) 40 μL Nystatin at 50 mg/mL, (2) 40 μL DMSO; panel B depicts (1) M9 medium for 24 h, (2) M8 medium for 24 h, (3) M7 medium for 24 h, (4) M6 medium for 24 h; panel C depicts (1) M9 medium for 12 h, (2) M8 medium for 12 h, (3) M7 medium for 12 h, and (4) M6 medium for 12 h.

FIG. 12 depicts an exemplary agar plates of M. fijiensis showing inhibitory growth in the presence of RejuAgro A at 600 μg/mL (panel A) but growth in the presence of RejuAgro A at 60 μg/mL (panel B) or without RejuAgro A (panel C).

FIG. 13A depicts the RejuAgro A molecule as having a planar structure—with S—Me group rotated only by 8.7° relative to the heterocycle. There is a notable break of π-conjugation in the molecule at C4-C5 bond (1.531 Å)—apparently, because of some orbital reasons. The Me-group connected to sp² carbon atom is rotationally disordered over 2 positions.

FIG. 13B depicts the RejuAgro A molecule in crystal form centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers through N—H . . . O interactions. Further, these dimers form 2-dimensional layers along [−3 0 1] plane via weaker C—H . . . O interactions.

FIG. 14A depicts the RejuAgro B crystal with two symmetrically independent RejuAgro B molecules. Each molecule has a twisted structure—with dihedral angle between mean planes of the linked heterocycles of 70. 3 and 80.6°. There is a notable break of π-conjugation in each heterocycle at C(sp²)-C(sp²) bond between two adjacent carbonyl groups (the bond lengths are in the 1.534-1.539 Å range)—apparently, because of some orbital reasons.

FIG. 14B depicts RejuAgro B molecules in crystal form centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers through N—H . . . O interactions. These dimers are linked in stacks along x direction by other N—H . . . O interactions. Finally, the stacks are linked by third kind of N—H . . . O interactions into layers along [011].

FIG. 15A depicts RejuAgro C molecule having a planar pi-conjugated shape with amide group rotated out of the plane of the rest of the atoms by 42°.

FIG. 15B depicts the RejuAgro C molecules in crystal are stacked along x-axis. The stacks are connected into layers along ab plane through H-bonds N—H . . . O. The layers are connected through multiple hydrogen bonds with solvate water molecules (3 mol. eq.) into a 3-dimensional network.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to a novel metabolite produced by seven Pseudomonas strains listed in this patent, such as 0617-T307, that exhibits antimicrobial activity against pathogenic microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi. From the 16S rRNA and other housekeeping gene sequences, the strain was identified as Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 in the Pseudomonas putida group. The cell broth of the 7 bacterial strains, such as 0617-T307, contains a novel, potent 6-membered heterocycle natural product which is designated as RejuAgro A, along with a dimer RejuAgro B, as depicted below:

These compounds, their method of production, and applications for inhibiting plant microbial pathogens are disclosed in greater detail herein.

Definitions

When introducing elements of aspects of the disclosure or particular embodiments, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements. The term “or” means any one member of a particular list and also includes any combination of members of that list, unless otherwise specified.

As intended herein, the terms “substantially,” “approximately,” and “about” and similar terms are intended to have a broad meaning in harmony with the common and accepted usage in the art to which the subject matter of this disclosure pertains. It should be understood by those of skill in the art who review this disclosure that these terms are intended to allow a description of certain features described and claimed without restricting the scope of these features to precise numerical ranges provided. Accordingly, these terms should be interpreted as indicating that insubstantial or inconsequential modifications or alterations of the subject matter described and claimed are considered to be within the scope of the invention as recited in the appended claims.

“Biological control agents (or BCAs)” are a way of managing pests, such as pathogens, weeds and insects, safely, sustainably, and cost-effectively. These agents are introduced into the environment to target a pest species, with the aim of reducing the pest's population or abundance in the environment.

“Biologicals” are preparations of living microorganisms (bacteria and yeasts) that produce colonies on the hosts. These microorganisms are applied mainly to slow the pathogen buildup during the epiphytic phase (Tianna et al. (2018)).

“Biorational” is a term applied to microbe-based biopesticides. These biopesticides are often made by fermenting microbial strains. Most of these products have both anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activity (Tianna et al. (2018)).

“Biopesticides” is defined by The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be pesticides derived from natural materials and categorizes them as either biochemical pesticides, containing substances that control pests by nontoxic mechanisms, microbial pesticides, consisting of microorganisms that typically produce bioactive natural products (BNPs), or plant-incorporated-protectants with activity produced by plants because of added genetic materials Gwinn K. D. (2018)).

The compounds referred to as RejuAgro A, RejuAgro B and RejuAgro C correspond to chemical compounds having the formulas (I), (II) and (III), respectively, as illustrated below:

In a first aspect, a method of growing bacteria to enhance production of protective metabolites is provided. The method includes alternative steps. In one method, a step of growing Pseudomonas bacteria in liquid media in a vessel to produce a bacterial fermentate is provided. The ratio of media volume to vessel volume is between about 1:2 and 1:10 and the vessel is shaken at a rate between about 100 and 250 RPM. According to an alternate step, the method includes growing Pseudomonas bacteria in liquid media in a fermenter to produce a bacterial fermentate. The air flow rate of the fermenter is between about 1 and 3 L/min. In one respect, the method further includes the step of separating the liquid media from the bacteria after a period of time to produce a protective supernatant comprising the protective metabolites. In a second respect, the bacteria include a Pseudomonas strain selected from 0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328. In a third respect, the growing temperature is between about 10 degrees C. and 35 degrees C. In a fourth respect, the liquid media is LB/YME media for the production of cells. In a fifth respect, the liquid media is YME media for the production of RejuAgro A. In a sixth respect, the ratio of media volume to vessel volume is between about 1:5 and 1:10. In a seventh respect, the ratio of media volume to vessel volume is between about 1:7 and 1:9. In an eighth respect, the ratio of media volume to vessel volume is about 1:8. In a ninth respect, the vessel is shaken at a rate between about 200 and 250 RPM. In a tenth respect, the vessel is shaken at a rate between about 210 and 230 RPM. In an eleventh respect, the air flow rate of the fermenter is between about 1.5 and 2.5 L/min and the concentration of dissolved oxygen is between 5 mg/L to 12 mg/L. In a twelfth respect, the growing temperature is between about 10 degrees C. and 20 degrees C. In a thirteenth respect, the growing temperature is between about 15 degrees C. and 17 degrees C. In a fourteenth respect, the bacteria are grown for a period of at 18 h to 7 days. In a fifteenth respect, the bacteria are grown for a period of seven days. In a sixteenth respect, the bacteria are grown for a period between one and two days.

In a second aspect, an agricultural composition comprising the bacterial fermentate or the protective supernatant is provided. The agricultural composition is produced according to the method of the first aspect and any of the respects disclosed with regard to the first aspect. In a first respect, the agricultural composition further includes a adjuvant. In this regard, the adjuvant is a surfactant.

In a third aspect, a method of controlling bacterial and fungal crop diseases is provided. The method includes several steps. A first step includes producing an agricultural composition comprising the bacterial fermentate or the protective supernatant produced by the first aspect or any of respects thereof. A second step includes applying said agricultural composition to crops to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms.

In a first respect, the crop diseases are selected from the group consisting of fire blight, citrus cankers, olive knot, and soft rot, tomatoes and pepper. In a second respect, the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora (Ea), Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac), Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (Psv), Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola, and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. In a third respect, the crop is selected from one or more of Bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae including carrots, potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes and cucurbits, peppers and green peppers, olive, stone and pome fruit plants including olives, peaches, walnuts.

In a fourth aspect, a method of controlling bacterial crop diseases is provided. The method includes one step. A step includes applying an agricultural composition comprising between about 1.0×10⁵ and 1.0×10⁹ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria to crops to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms.

In a first respect, the Pseudomonas bacteria is a Pseudomonas strain selected from 0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328. In a second respect, the composition comprises between about 5.0×10⁷ and 2.0×10⁸ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria. In a third respect, the crop disease is selected from the group consisting of Black sigatoka, Grey mould, Fire blight, Citrus canker, soft rot, Olive knot, Tomato bacterial speck, Bacterial canker or blast (stone and pome fruits), Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits, Bacterial Spot of Peach, Tomato bacterial spot, walnut blight, bacterial wilt, Tomato canker, Potato late blight, apple scab, bacterial leaf blight, and bacterial leaf streak. In a fourth respect, the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora (Ea), Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac), Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (Psv), Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola, and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. In a fifth respect, the crop is selected from one or more of Bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae including carrots, potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes and cucurbits, peppers and green peppers, olive, stone and pome fruit plants including olives, peaches, walnuts.

In a fifth aspect, a method of purifying protective metabolites from Pseudomonas bacteria is provided. The method includes several steps. A first step includes producing a bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant by the method of the first aspect and the respects thereof. A second step includes extracting the bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant by ethyl acetate extraction. A third step includes producing an eluate containing protective metabolites by eluting the bacterial fermentate or protective supernatant using a mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate, such as, for example, a mixture of 50% hexane and 50% ethyl acetate, or by eluting the ethyl acetate extracts using a mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate, such as, for example, a mixture of 25% hexane and 75% ethyl acetate.

In a first respect, the Pseudomonas bacteria is a Pseudomonas strain selected from 0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328.

In a sixth aspect, an agricultural composition comprising protective metabolites from Pseudomonas bacteria purified by the method of the fifth aspect and respects thereof.

In a seventh aspect, a method of controlling bacterial crop diseases is provided. The method includes several steps. A first step includes producing an agricultural composition comprising protective metabolites from Pseudomonas bacteria purified by the method of the fifth aspect or any of the respects thereof. A second step includes applying said agricultural composition to crops to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms.

In a first respect, the crop disease is selected from the group consisting of fire blight, citrus cankers, olive knot, soft rot, tomatoes and peppers. In a second respect, the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora (Ea) (especially the streptomycin-resistant E. amylovora strains), Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri (Xac), Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (Psv), Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola, and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. In a third respect, the pathogenic E. amylovora is the streptomycin-resistant E. amylovora. In a fourth respect, the crop is selected from one or more of Bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae including carrots, potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes and cucurbits, peppers and green peppers, olive, stone and pome fruit plants including olives, peaches, walnuts. In a fifth respect, the pathogenic bacterium is Flavobacterium columnare #2, Flavobacterium columnare MS-FC-4. In a sixth respect, the pathogenic bacterium is E. coli O157:H7.

In an eighth aspect, a crystalline compound selected from one of the following structures:

In a first respect, the crystalline compound is the following structure:

wherein the crystalline compound includes at least one physical property is selected from Tables 13-22.

In a second respect, the crystalline compound is the following structure:

wherein the crystalline compound includes at least one physical property is selected from Tables 23-29.

In a third respect, the crystalline compound is the following structure:

wherein the crystalline compound includes at least one physical property is selected from Tables 30-37. Biological Deposit Information

The bacterial strains Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307, Pseudomonas soli 0917-T305, Pseudomonas soli 0917-T306, Pseudomonas soli 0917-T307, Pseudomonas mosselii 0118-T319, Pseudomonas mosselii 0318-T327, and Pseudomonas mosselii 0418-T328 were submitted to the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC®), P.O. Box 1549, Manassas, Va. 20110 USA (“ATCC Patent Depository”) on Jun. 25, 2020 and were accorded unofficial ATCC patent numbers PTA-126796, PTA-126797, PTA-126798, PTA-126799, PTA-126800, PTA-126801, and PTA-126802, respectively. Following viability testing, the ATCC Patent Depository accorded these deposited bacterial strains the following Accession numbers, effective Jun. 25, 2020: Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126796), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T305 (Accession No. PTA-126797), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T306 (Accession No. PTA-126798), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126799), Pseudomonas mosselii 0118-T319 (Accession No. PTA-126800), Pseudomonas mosselii 0318-T327 (Accession No. PTA-126801), and Pseudomonas mosselii 0418-T328 (Accession No. PTA-126802).

EXAMPLES Example 1. Identification and Characterization of Strain 0617-T307

Partial sequences from 16S rDNA, gyrB, rpoB and rpoD were analyzed. These four genes are the recommended markers for multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) in Pseudomonas species (Peix et al. (2018)).

For species assignment, these four sequences were used to run BLASTN against the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database. Based on the result, strain 0617-T307 is closely related to Pseudomonas species in the P. putida group within the P. fluorescens lineage. The “MLSA phylogeny” and “list of genomes from the type strains of Pseudomonas spp.” of (Peix et al. (2018); see FIG. 2 and Table 2 in Peix et al. (2018)) were used as the guide for taxon sampling (FIG. 1 ). Based on this information, the genomes were obtained from GenBank. All species in the P. putida group with high quality genome assemblies were included. Because 0617-T307 has the highest rpoD (i.e., the gene with the highest resolution power for Pseudomonas species assignation) sequence similarity with P. soli, all four available genomes of P. soli were included in the sampling (including the type strain of P. soli, LMG 27941^(T)). For other species in the P. fluorescens lineage, one species was selected as the representative for each group. P. aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa group; P. aeruginosa lineage) was included as the outgroup to root the tree.

The four genes for MLSA were extracted from the genomes sampled. Each gene was aligned individually, then all four nucleotide alignments were concatenated for phylogenetic analysis. The concatenated alignment contains 9,912 aligned nucleotide sites. The maximum likelihood inference was performed using PhyML (Guindon et al. (2003)). The bootstrap support was assessed by 1,000 replicates.

Based on the multilocus molecular phylogeny (FIG. 1 ), 0617-T307 and all four P. soli strains with genome sequences available form a monophyletic clade with 100% bootstrap support. This result provided a strong support for assigning 0617-T307 to P. soli, a type strain which has been reported to be isolated from a soil sample from the Sierra Nevada National Park, Spai (Pascual et al. (2014))

Furthermore, based on the guidelines for Pseudomonas species assignation provided by García-Valdés and Lalucat ((Garcia-Valdés et al. (2016)), additional support for assigning 0617-T307 to P. soli included: (a) 16S rDNA >98.7-99% identical. Compared to the type strain of P. soli, 0617-T307 shared 99.2% sequence identity. Compared to the sister species P. entomophila, 0617-T307 shared 99.5% sequence identity. Note that 16S rDNA is known to lack sufficient resolution power for species identification in Pseudomonas (García-Valdés et al. (2016); Peix et al. (2018)); (b) rpoD gene >95-96% identical. Compared to the type strain of P. soli, 0617-T307 shared 96.5% sequence identity. Compared to the sister species P. entomophila, 0617-T307 shared only 89.1% sequence identity; and (c) MLSA >97% identical. Compared to the type strain of P. soli, 0617-T307 shared 98.0% sequence identity. Compared to the sister species P. entomophila, 0617-T307 shared only 95.1% sequence identity.

Example 2. Preparation, Isolation and Characterization of RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B from Ethyl Acetate Extracts of the Cell Broth of Strain 0617-T307

The preparation of RejuAgro A and B can be obtained by ethyl acetate extraction of the cell broth from the fermenter fermentation, followed by the chromatographic isolation and purification. Briefly, the stock bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 0617-T307 was streaked onto LB plate (Tryptone, 10 g/L; Yeast extract, 5 g/L; NaCl, 10 g/L; agar, 15 g/L; water) and grew in a 28° C. incubator for 24 h. For the preparation of seed media, single colony of 0617-T307 was inoculated into a 2.0 L flask containing 500 mL autoclaved YME media (yeast extract, 4 g/L; glucose 4 g/L and malt extract 10 g/L) and grow at 28° C. for 24 h in a shaking speed of 200 rpm. Then the seed media was inoculated into a 20 L NB S fermenter containing 12 L autoclaved YME media. The fermentation was proceeded at 16° C. for 1-7 days. The agitation speed and the airflow rate were 200 rpm and 2 L/min, respectively.

After harvesting, the bacterial culture was extracted by ethyl acetate for four times. The ethyl acetate layer was separated and dehydrated using sodium sulfate and dried by rotary evaporation at 35° C. This resulted 2.9 g crude extract from 12 L culture of strain 0617-T307.

The concentrated sample was dissolved in ethyl acetate and mixed with silica gel, which was packed as an injection column (φ3.0×20 cm) and mounted atop a silica gel Universal Column (4.8×18.5 cm) on a flash chromatography system (Yamazen AI-580) equipped with an UV detector. After loading the sample, the sample was eluted by the 280 mL of each of the following solvents in order with an increasing polarity, 100% hexane, 75% hexane/25% ethyl acetate, 50% hexane/50% ethyl acetate, 25% hexane/75% ethyl acetate, 100% ethyl acetate, 50% ethyl acetate/50% acetone, 100% acetone, and 100% methanol. The sample was eluted at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. The elute was monitored at UV 254 nm, and fractions were collected by a time mode at 20 mL/tubes. Totally, there are 114 fractions or tubes generated from the flash chromatography.

The generated fractions were applied for the subsequent plate assays. One mL of each fraction was picked up into a 1.5 mL test tube and vacuum dried by an Eppendorf vacuum concentrator. The dried sample was dissolved in 50 μL DMSO, of which 2 μL was used in the plate assay. Briefly, Erwinia amylovora 273 was streaked onto LB plate to grow at 28° C. incubator and single colony obtained after 24 h was inoculated into 5 mL LB media to allow an overnight growth at 28° C. shaker at 200 rpm. The bacteria were diluted 1:100 in sterile water, of which 225 μL was plated onto 50% LB plate (Tryptone, 5.0 g/L; Yeast extract, 2.5 g/L; NaCl, 5.0 g/L, Agar, 15 g/L). After dried in the biosafety cabinet for 10 mins, the DMSO solution of each fraction was then distributed to its pre-labeled section of the petri dish and allowed to dry for another 10 min. Along with the assay, DMSO and Kasugamycin were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The plates were then incubated at 28° C. incubator and the inhibitory zone was checked one day later.

In vitro plate assay for the 114 fractions showed two fractions that inhibited the growth of E. amylovora 273. Notably, fractions/tubes 38-40 (which was abbreviated as T3840 or Flash-RejuAgro A), which were eluded by 50% hexane/50% ethyl acetate, had a relatively large zone of clearance that potently could be promising with further testing. The other bioactive compound in this assay was in fractions 50-52 (which was coded as T5052). These fractions were eluded by 25% hexane/75% ethyl acetate.

Preparative HPLC (Prep-HPLC) purification of the fraction 3840 and 5054 lead to the discovery of 15 mg yellow colored compound RejuAgro A (Rt17.5) and 103.3 mg dark-green colored compound RejuAgro B, respectively. RejuAgro A can be dissolved in methanol and chloroform. RejuAgro B (Rt10.5) does not dissolve well in methanol or chloroform, but it can be dissolved very well in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in a dark-green color. The structures of the two compounds have been investigated by High resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS), infrared (IR), Ultraviolet (UV), 1D and 2D Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as well as X-ray crystal structure analysis. It showed that these two compounds are structurally similar, the compound RejuAgro A contain 7 types of carbon groups (three types carbonyl, two types tertiary carbons, two types of methyl carbons), but the RejuAgro B lack one type of methyl group, as shown below:

RejuAgro A crystals were further obtained by slow evaporation of its chloroform solution at room temperature. The crystals were identified as orange tablets. The dataset was collected at 100K with an Oxford SuperNova diffractometer using Cu(Kα) radiation. The molecule has a planar structure—with S-Me (methyl) group rotated only by 8.7° relative to the heterocycle. There is a notable break of π-conjugation in the molecule at C4-C5 bond (1.531 Å)—apparently, because of some orbital reasons. The Me-group connected to sp² carbon atom is rotationally disordered over 2 positions. The molecules in crystal form centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers through N—H . . . O interactions. Further, these dimers form 2-dimensional layers along [−3 0 1] plane via weaker C—H . . . O interactions. RejuAgro A molecule represents a 6-membered heterocycle [—NH—C(═O)—C(—SMe)═C(—Me)—C(═O)—C(═O)—]. The crystal of RejuAgro B was identified as triclinic. The structure of RejuAgro B contains two symmetrically independent molecules. Each molecule has a twisted structure—with dihedral angle between mean planes of the linked heterocycles of 70. 3 and 80.6°. There is a notable break of n-conjugation in each heterocycle at C(sp²)-C(sp²) bond between two adjacent carbonyl groups (the bond lengths are in the 1.534-1.539 Å range)—apparently, because of some orbital reasons. The molecules in crystal form centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers through N—H . . . O interactions. These dimers are linked in stacks along x direction by other N—H . . . O interactions, Finally, the stacks are linked by third kind of N—H . . . O interactions into layers along [0 1 1]. When RejuAgro B solution was used for the crystal growth, two crystals were obtained and named RejuAgro B and RejuAgro C. The crystals of both RejuAgro B and RejuAgro C have very similar molecule mass (see Example 20).

The crystal structure information of RejuAgro A, RejuAgro B, and RejuAgro C are presented in Example 20, the contents of which form part of this application and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The molecule formula of RejuAgro A is C₇H₇NO₃S, and the Molecular Weight: 185.2004. This is in consistent to the observed molecule species of [M+H] at m/z 186.2177 (theoretical 186.2083) in HR-MS data. The molecule formula of RejuAgro B is C₁₂H₈N₂O₆S, and the Molecular Weight: 276.2017. This is in consistent to the observed molecule species of [M—H] at m/z 275.0278 (theoretical 275.1960) in HR-MS data. CCDC structural database search as of Aug. 4, 2020 indicates there are no crystal structures of RejuAgro A, RejuAgro B and RejuAgro C. Other chemical database such as SciFinder, Reaxys, and Google patents and patent-related database search demonstrated that there are no analogs of RejuAgro A or RejuAgro C, except for one reference for RejuAgro B was found from SciFinder and Reaxys (Knackmuss et al. (1968)).

Example 3. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B from Strain 0617-T307

The MIC values of RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B were determined for five types of bacteria: wild type gram-negative plant pathogenetic bacteria, streptomycin-resistant E. amylovora, fish disease causing bacteria, gram-positive and gram-negative human pathogenetic bacteria, and the producer of RejuAgro A (strain 0617-T307). The antimicrobial assay was performed according to the CLSI Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) Standards. Briefly, the stock solution of each of the tested bacteria was streaked onto LB (Luria-Bertani) plate (tryptone, 10 g/L; yeast extract, 5 g/L; sodium salt, 10 g/L; Agar, 15 g/L). For special culture, NA (Nutrient broth+Agar) plate (beef extract, 3 g/L; yeast extract, 1 g/L; polypeptone, 5 g/L; sucrose, 10 g/L; and agar 15 g/L) was used for Xac. SHIEH (tryptone, 5 g/L; yeast extract, 0.5 g/L; sodium acetate, 0.01 g/L; BaCl₂(H₂O)₂, 0.01 g/L; K₂HPO₄, 0.1 g/L; KH₂PO₄, 0.05 g/L; MgSO₄.7H₂O, 0.3 g/L; CaCl₂.2H₂O, 0.0067 g/L; FeSO₄.7H₂O, 0.001 g/L; NaHCO₃, 0.05 g/L; agar, 10 g/L) and TYES (tryptone 4 g/L; yeast extract 0.4 g/L; MgSO4, 0.5 g/L; CaCl₂ 0.5 g/L; pH to 7.2, agar, 15 g/L) were used for Flavobacterium columnare strains MS-FC-4 and #2, respectively. After that, the single colony from the plate was picked up and inoculated into the corresponding liquid media to grow overnight. The culture was diluted to OD₅₉₀=0.01 in LB or the corresponding media, and distributed at 200 μL/well in 96 well plates. The compound RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B and streptomycin was diluted and 4 μL of each concentration was added into each well to make a final concentration of 40 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, 2.5 μg/mL, 1.25 μg/mL, 0.625 μg/mL, 0.3125 μg/mL, 0.15625 μg/mL, 0.078 μg/mL. The vehicle water (for streptomycin) or DMSO (for RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B) were used as control.

The assay results showed that RejuAgro A rather than RejuAgro B is the most active metabolite of strain 0617-T307. When compared with the effects on the gram-positive MRSA (MIC>40 μg/mL) and gram-negative E. coli O157:H7 (an important food- and waterborne pathogen that causes diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) in humans) (MIC=40 μg/mL), RejuAgro A is specifically efficient against the tested bacteria, with the MIC values of 5-40 μg/mL. The antimicrobial activity of RejuAgro A is equivalent to streptomycin regarding the strain Erwinia amylovora 1189, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, Pectobacterium parmentieri UPP163 936, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp brasillensis 944, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum wppl4 945, Dickeya dadantii 3937, which showed a MIC value of 5 μg/mL for E. amylovora, and 20-40 μg/mL for the other soft pathogenetic bacteria. The Xanthomonas bacteria are very sensitive to streptomycin, with a MIC value of 0.16 μg/mL, this is lower than the MIC value 5 μg/mL for RejuAgro A. The MIC value of RejuAgro A for Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi is 40 μg/mL. The MIC value of RejuAgro A for Xanthomonas arboricola pv. Juglandis 219 is 6.25 μg/mL. The MIC value of RejuAgro A for Ralstonia solanacearum K60 and Pss4 is 3.13 and 6.25 μg/mL respectively. The MIC value of RejuAgro A for Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis NCPPB382, Cmm 0317, Cmm 0690 is 6.25, 1.56, and 12.5 μg/mL respectively. The MIC value of RejuAgro A for Ralstonia solanacearum K60 and Pss4 is 40 μg/mL.

RejuAgro A was also tested against other E. amylovora strains that include one virulence E. amylovora and three streptomycin-resistant E. amylovora strains. RejuAgro A showed the same efficacy as streptomycin against E. amylovora 110 (MIC value 5 μg/mL). However, RejuAgro A is more efficient against E. amylovora 1189 than streptomycin. The MIC values of RejuAgro A and streptomycin to E. amylovora 1189 are 5 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL respectively. In addition, RejuAgro A is much more efficient against streptomycin-resistant E. amylovora CA11, DM1 and 898 as a lower MIC values (10 μg/mL) than the streptomycin's MIC values (>40 μg/mL) was observed for RejuAgro A. These results suggest that RejuAgro A is the most potent compound in the test against E. amylovora and represent a potential candidate for the replacement of streptomycin. There is no indication of cross resistance to RejuAgro A in streptomycin resistant strains.

Regarding the effects on the fish columnaris disease causing Flavobacterium, RejuAgro A has MIC values 5 μg/mL for Flavobacterium columnare strains MS-FC-4 and #2 (cause columnaris disease in wild and cultured fish), which is higher than the MIC values of streptomycin (0.31 μg/mL and 1.25 μg/mL for strain #2 and MS-FC-4, respectively).

The influence of RejuAgro A against strain 0617-T307 was tested. It showed that the MIC value of RejuAgro A against Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 (the RejuAgro A producer) is larger than 40 μg/mL in the tested LB media, which means the strain 0617-T307 can live and resistant to at least in 40 μg/mL RejuAgro A that produced by itself.

RejuAgro A was tested along with streptomycin against tomato pathogens (P. syringae. pv. tomato PT30, P. syringae. pv syringae 7046, P. syringae. pv. lachrymans 1188-1) and other citrus canker pathogens (Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria XV-16). The MIC values of RejuAgro A against P. syringae are 40 μg/mL, while the streptomycin's MIC values are 2.5-5 μg/mL. Regarding to the X. campestris species, RejuAgro A's MIC values are 2.5 μg/mL or 40 μs/mL, which is smaller than the MIC values of streptomycin, which are 20 μg/mL or larger than 40 μg/mL. These displayed that when compared to the Pseudomonas caused tomato pathogens, Xanthomonas campestris pathogens are more sensitive to RejuAgro A than streptomycin.

RejuAgro A showed efficacy against all of tested pathogenic fungi (Table 1). RejuAgro A was tested against Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis and Mycosphaerella fijiensis. RejuAgro A showed 100% inhibition against P. infestans. and V. inaequalis. at 40 μg/mL, 80 μg/mL and 600 μg/mL (Table 1).

TABLE 1 Summary of the antimicrobial effect of RejuAgro A MIC (μg/mL) Strain (related disease) RejuAgro A Streptomycin Erwinia amylovora 1189 5 20 (Fire blight on apples/pears) Erwinia amylovora 110^(a) 5 5 (Fire blight on apples/pears) Erwinia amylovora CA11^(b) 10 >40 (Fire blight on apples/pears) Erwinia amylovora DM1^(b) 10 >40 (Fire blight on apples/pears) Erwinia amylovora 898^(c) 10 >40 (Fire blight on apples/pears) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri-Miami 5 0.16 XC2002-00010 (Citrus canker) Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri N40-SO5 5 0.16 (Citrus canker) Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus >40 10 USA300 (Skin infection, sepsis) Pectobacterium parmentieri UPP163 936 40 40 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Pectobacterium atrosepticum 942 20 20 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. 40 40 brasiliensis 944 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. 40 40 carotovorum wpp14 945 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Dickeya dadantii 3937 40 20 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi 40 0.31 (Olive knot) E coli O157:H7 (Foodborne illness) 40 20 Flavobacterium columnare #2 5 0.31 (Fish columnaris disease) Flavobacterium columnare MS-FC-4 5 1.25 (Fish columnaris disease) Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 >40 >40 (RejuAgro A producer) Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato PT30 40 2.5 (Tomato bacterial speck) Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae 7046 20 2.5 (Bacterial canker or blast (stone and pome fruits)) Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans 10 5 1188-1 (Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits) Xanthomonas campestris pv. Pruni 40 >40 (Bacterial Spot of Peach) Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria 2.5 20 XV-16 (Tomato bacterial spot) Xanthomonas arboricola pv. Juglandis 219 6.25 0.39 (walnut blight) Ralstonia solanacearum K60 (bacterial wilt) 3.13 12.5 Ralstonia solanacearum Pss4 (bacterial wilt) 6.25 12.5 Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. 6.25 12.5 michiganensis NCPPB382 (Tomato canker) Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. 1.56 3.12 michiganensis Cmm 0317 (Tomato canker) Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. 12.5 12.5 michiganensis Cmm 0690 (Tomato canker) Phytophthora infestans Pi 1306 40 NA (Potato late blight) Phytophthora infestans Pi 88069 40 NA (Potato late blight) Venturia inaequalis (Apple scab) 80 NA^(e) Mycosphaerella fijiensis 10CR-25 600 NA (black sigatoka of Banana) ^(a)Ea110 is the virulent strain used for the field trials in Michigan state; ^(b)Both CA11 and DM1 are streptomycin-resistant strains containing Tn5393 with the transposon on the acquired plasmid pEa34 and can grow in 100 μg/mL streptomycin containing media; ^(c)Ea898 is a spontaneous streptomycin-resistant strain with a mutation in the chromosomal rpsL gene and can grow in the media containing 2000 μg/mL streptomycin; ^(d)Copper resistant bacteria; ^(e)Positive control Copper solution at 1000 μg/mL inhibits 61% of the growth.

Example 4. Production and Stability of RejuAgro A from Strain 0617-T307 in a Shaking-Flask Fermentation

The fermentation of 0617-T307 for the production and preparation of RejuAgro A can be obtained by two approaches, the shaking-flask fermentation and fermenter fermentation. The fermenter fermentation was described in Example 2. In this example, the flask fermentation can be obtained as below. The stock bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 0617-T307 was streaked onto YME agar plate (yeast extract, 4 g/L; glucose 4 g/L and malt extract 10 g/L; agar, 15 g/L) and grew at 28° C. incubator for 24 h. The seed media were made by growing single colony of 0617-T307 in a 250 mL flask containing 50 mL sterile YME liquid media at 16° C. and 220 rpm for 24 h. Then the seed media were inoculated into 4 L flask containing 0.5 L sterile YME media at 4% ratio (v/v). Following the inoculation (2%, v/v) into eight 4-L flasks each containing 2 L YME media, the bacteria were grown at 16° C. in a shaker at 200-220 rpm for 1-7 days.

The RejuAgro A concentration was obtained by LC-MS analysis according to the developed standard curves. Two methods were used for the preparation of samples for LC-MS analysis. One approach is to extract the cell broth by ethyl acetate (1 mL:1 mL, vortex for 1 min), and to obtain the ethyl acetate extracts by centrifugation and vacuum drying of the ethyl acetate layer. The dried ethyl acetate extracts were dissolved in 40 μL methanol and 2 methanol solution was used for LC-MS analysis. The other method is to obtain the supernatant by centrifuging the cell broth, then mix the supernatant with equal volume of methanol to make the 50% methanol solution, of which 10 μL solution was injected into LC-MS. The second method was used because RejuAgro A production is an extracellular secretion process, which was demonstrated by the observation of the major amount of RejuAgro A in the supernatants rather than inside of the cells (FIG. 3A).

During the 7-day fermentation, the total production of RejuAgro A reached peak concentration on day one, then started to decrease with time increasing (FIG. 3B). Further detailed study on the production of RejuAgro A and the cell concentration were performed each 6 hours in shaking-flask fermentation. It showed that the concentration of RejuAgro A (total amount of RejuAgro A) reached to the maximum value of 13.8 mg/L at 18 h, and the concentration of bacteria cells reached to the maximum value of 2×10¹¹ CFU/mL at 12 h, which indicates the production of RejuAgro A is a cell growth-associated production process.

The volumes of the media in the 4-L shake-flasks affect the production of RejuAgro A. In the 4-L flasks with YME media, the production of RejuAgro A was only observed for the 500 mL volume size, and not observed for the 1.0 L or 1.5 L volume size. This observation indicates that the production of RejuAgro A prefers to occur in a highly aerated condition.

The media types and culture temperatures affect the production of RejuAgro A. LB media was tested in parallel with YME media at 16° C. or 28° C. The production of RejuAgro A was observed in YME media but not in LB media at 16° C. Regarding the colony forming units, strain 0617-T307 grows well in LB media at both 16° C. and 28° C., and in YME media at 28° C. These results suggest that the production of RejuAgro A is both medium-specific and temperature-dependent. The activity for the products from 0617-T307 was monitored by plate assay against E. amylovora, which is consistent to the production of RejuAgro A.

To check the applicability of the production conditions for RejuAgro A, ten other Pseudomonas strains were tested under the same condition in parallel with the Pseudomonas strain 0617-T307. According to the analysis of housekeeping genes, 0917-T305, 0917-T306 and 0917-T307 were identified as Pseudomonas soli, and 0118-T319, 0318-T327 and 0418-T328 were identified as Pseudomonas mosselii. The type strains of both Pseudomonas. soli and Pseudomonas mosselii have been reported (Daboussi et al. (2002); Pascual et al. (2014)).

It showed that strain 0617-T307 and its phylogenetically closely related species can produce RejuAgro A in YME at 28° C. and 220 rpm. This result suggests that the method is specific for the strain 0617-T307 and some of its closely related species to produce RejuAgro A (Table 2). RejuAgro A can be present and stable in the culture at room temperature for at least 4 weeks, as tested by LCMS for 40-h culture obtained by growing 0617-T307 in YME media on a shaker at 16° and 220 rpm.

TABLE 2 Summary of RejuAgro A producing capabilities for the selected Pseudomonas strains that were cultured in medium YME at 16° C., 18 hours, 220 rpm. Production of Strain code Top-hit taxon RejuAgro A 0617-T307 Pseudomonas soli Yes 0617-T318 Pseudomonas protegens No 0817-T317 Pseudomonas protegens No 0717-T327 Pseudomonas koreensis No 0717-T314 Pseudomonas koreensis No 0917-T305 Pseudomonas soli Yes 0917-T306 Pseudomonas soli Yes 0917-T307 Pseudomonas soli Yes 0118-T319 Pseudomonas mosselii Yes 0318-T327 Pseudomonas mosselii Yes 0418-T328 Pseudomonas mosselii Yes

Example 5. Antimicrobial Activity of Cell Broth of Strain 0617-T307 Against 0617-T307 and E. amylovora

Two assays were used for the antimicrobial test of 0617-T307 cell broth and metabolites. One is plate diffusion assay and the other one is microplate assay. LB plate was used for the plate diffusion assay of the antimicrobial activity of RejuAgro A containing fractions and cell broths against E. amylovora (Table 3). Both cell broth containing living cells of 0617-T307 and RejuAgro A containing suspension at 2 mg/mL showed the antimicrobial activity against E. amylovora. However, no inhibitory zone was observed when Serenade® was applied.

TABLE 3 The activity of 0617-T307 cells and RejuAgro A against E. amylovora in LB plates Diameter of the Sample Concentration (mg/mL) Inhibitory zone (cm) RejuAgro A 2 1.1 0617-T307 cells ND^(a) 0.8 RejuAgro B 2 0 Serenade original solution 0 Streptomycin 2 2.4 Kasugamycin 1.3 DMSO 0 ^(a)The concentration of the bacterial cells was not determined.

To find a biological control recipe consisting both 0617-T307 cells and the active component RejuAgro A, the following experiments were done. The supernatant of the 40-h cell broth of 0617-T307 (abbreviated as ‘supernatant’) containing RejuAgro A was used for the antimicrobial assay against its producer 0617-T307. It showed that the strain 0617-T307 was able to grow in 2× dilution of supernatant in LB media rather than in YME media. Further study showed that the inhibitory effect of the supernatant is due to the lower pH value. Then the question 1 and 2 can be answered yes by controlling pH to 6.5˜6.8.

The bioactive fractions (crude extracts, 100 μg/mL; flash-RejuAgro A, 20 μg/mL; HPLC-RejuAgro A, 10 μg/mL) were tested against strains 0617-T307, Ea and Xac. It showed that the bioactive fractions were not able to inhibit the growth of strain 0617-T307, which demonstrates RejuAgro A can be mixed with 0617-T307 cells for the preparation of biocontrol agents. The bioactive fractions containing RejuAgro A showed inhibitory effects against Ea and Xac, especially the flash-RejuAgro A and HPLC-RejuAgro A, almost abolish the growth of Ea and Xac under the tested conditions. This demonstrates that the RejuAgro A solution can be used for the biocontrol of fire blight and citrus cankers at 10-20 μg/mL.

Example 6. Identification and Characterization of the Bioactive Metabolites from Ethyl Acetate Extracts of the Acidified Supernatant (pH 2.0) of Strain 0617-T307

The stock bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 0617-T307 was inoculated onto LB agar (Tryptone, 10 g/L; Yeast extract, 5 g/L; NaCl, 10 g/L; agar, 15 g/L; water) plate and grew at 28° C. incubator for 24 h. For the preparation of seed media, single colony of 0617-T307 was inoculated into 500 mL autoclaved YME media (yeast extract, 4 g/L; glucose 4 g/L and malt extract 10 g/L) and grow at 28° C. for 24 h in a shaking speed of 150 rpm. Then the seed media was inoculated into eight 4-L flasks each containing 2 L autoclaved YME media. The fermentation was proceeded at 16° C. in a shaker with a shaking speed of 150 rpm for 7 days.

After 7-day growth, the supernatants were obtained by centrifuging bacterial culture at 4000 rpm for 15 min. The pH of the supernatant was then adjusted to 2.0 by adding 6N HCl. The acidified supernatants were then subjected to the ethyl acetate extraction. This resulted 3.0 g crude extract from 14 L culture of strain 0617-T307.

The concentrated sample was dissolved in acetone and mixed with silica gel, which was loaded to a silica gel column (φ3.0×20 cm) on a flash chromatography system (Yamazen AI-580) equipped with an UV detector. After loading the sample, the sample was eluted by the 280 mL of each of the following solvents in order with an increasing polarity, 100% hexane, 75% hexane/25% ethyl acetate, 50% hexane/50% ethyl acetate, 25% hexane/75% ethyl acetate, 100% ethyl acetate, 50% ethyl acetate 50% acetone, 100% acetone, and 100% methanol. The sample was eluted at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. The elute was monitored at UV 254 nm, and fractions were collected by a time mode at 20 mL/tubes. Totally, there are 114 fractions or tubes generated from the flash chromatography.

The generated fractions were applied for the subsequent plate assays. One mL of each fractions was picked up into a 1.5 mL test tube and vacuum dried by an Eppendorf vacuum concentrator. The dried sample was dissolved in 50 μL DMSO, of which 2 μL was used in the plate assay. Briefly, Erwinia amylovora 273 was inoculated into 50% LB (Tryptone, 5.0 g/L; Yeast extract, 2.5 g/L; NaCl, 5.0 g/L) plate and single colony will be inoculated into 5 mL LB media. The bacteria will be diluted 1:100 in sterile water, of which 225 μL was plated onto 50% LB plate. After dried in the biosafety cabinet for 10 mins, the DMSO solution of each fraction was then distributed to its pre-labeled section of the petri dish and allowed to dry for another 10 min. Along with the assay, DMSO and Kasugamycin were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The plates were then incubated at 28° C. incubator and the inhibitory zone will be checked after one day.

In vitro plate assay for the 114 flash fractions indicated three bioactive fractions (T3234, T5058 and T7882) that inhibited the growth of E. amylovora 273. Fractions 3234 and 5258 showed relatively small zone of clearance. Fraction 3234 is eluded by 50% hexane/50% ethyl acetate. Fraction 5058 was eluted by 25% hexane/75% ethyl acetate. For the negative control, DMSO did not have a zone of inhibition and the positive control Kasugamycin did show a zone of inhibition. Another flash fraction T7882 was eluted by acetone/ethyl acetate (50%/50%). It inhibited the growth of E. amylovora activity as well.

Further anti-E. amylovora activity-guided HPLC isolation and purification identified two antimicrobial compounds (Rt22.9 and Rt25.0) from T5058 (see compound formulas 0617_T307_5058 Rt22.9 and 0617_T307_5058 Rt25.0), and one antimicrobial compound (Rt18.9) from T7882 (see compound formula 0617_T307_7882 Rt18.9). T307_5058_Rt22.9 and T307_5058_Rt25.0 are tryptophan derived natural products, and their structures were reported in Scifinder database but not the biological activities (Loots et al. (2015)). 0617_T307_7882 Rt18 was predicted to be a derivative of difuryl that has been reported previously (Osipov et al. (1978)). These natural products are depicted below:

Example 7. Identification of Other Metabolites from Strain 0617-T307 Using LCMSMS and Spectral Library Search

The crude extracts of non-pH adjusted cell broth and pH-adjusted cell broth (pH of the cell broth was adjusted to 2.0 by 6N HCl) was concentrated and resuspended in 250 100% MeOH containing internal standard (m/z 311.08) and used for LC-MS/MS analysis. LC Injection Volume: 5 μL; LC Column: 1.7 μM C18, 100A, 50×2.1 mm Kinetex from Phenomenex C18 column with a 12 min gradient. 5-95% ACN on a Bruker Maxis Impact II. Data was acquired on a Bruker MaXis Impact II, UHR-QqTOF (Ultra-High Resolution Qq-Time-Of-Flight) mass spectrometry. Each full MS scan was followed by tandem MS (MS/MS) using collision-induced dissociation (CID) fragmentation of the eight most abundant ions in the spectrum. The scan rate was 3 Hz.

Exact spectral library search was then performed based on the bioinformatics analysis and molecule network analysis for the identification of new and known compounds. MS/MS spectra in samples were searched against the following spectral libraries, 1) GNPS Community Library; 2) FDA Library; PhytoChemical Library; 3) NIH Clinical Collections; 4) NIH Natural Products Library; 5) Pharamacologically Active NIH Small Molecule Repository; 6) Faulkner Legacy Library; 7) Pesticides; 8) Dereplicator Identified MS/MS Peptidic Natural Products; 9) PNNL Lipids; 10) Massbank; 11) Massbank EU; 12) MoNA; 13) ReSpect—Phytochemicals; 14) HMDB.

MS/MS spectra in samples were searched the above libraries and allowed to align with an offset to reference spectra. The match parameters were the same. These results can be explored to identify structural analogs of known compounds. MS/MS molecular network generated with minimum cluster size=2, minimum edge 0.7 cosine, 6 minimum matched peaks. As an example, the new molecule species at m/z 303.16 was identified to be corresponding to a new compound from the active fraction 0617-T307_5058_Rt25.0. Some of the known compounds were identified from the crude extract, which includes the Indole-3-carboxylic acid, a plant growth-promoting factor, and xantholysin A. It is reported that 1) the broad antifungal activity of P. putida BW11M1 is mainly dependent on Xantholysin production; 2) Xantholysin is required for swarming and contributes to biofilm formation (Li et al. (2013)). Indeed, the higher concentration of xantholysin A was observed by culturing 0617-T307, 0418-T328 and 0318-T327 at 28° C. So, except for the bioactive compound RejuAgro A, Xantholysin A is another contribution metabolite for the antimicrobial activity of the biocontrol bacteria 0617-T307 and its closely related species 0318-T3027 and 0418-T328.

Example 8. Greenhouse and Field Infection Assays for Strain 0617-T307 and Some of its Closely Related Species that Produce RejuAgro A

To evaluate the biological control activity of 0617-T307 against Erwinia amylovora, we conducted an infection assay on crabapple trees at greenhouse of University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Biological control agent (0617-T307, 0717-T327, and 0617-T318) containing 1.0×10⁸ cfu per mL was sprayed onto the flowers (80% to full bloom) in multiple-tree plots. Briefly, the strain 0617-T307 was grown in 26 mL glass tube containing 5 mL LB media overnight, the cells were then inoculated (1:100) into LB media and grow on a shaker at 28° C. and 200 rpm for 14-18 h. Cells were harvested and resuspended in 10x water to reach 10⁸ CFU/mL. The resuspended solution can be used for greenhouse and field assay for fire blight control. Control flowers were sprayed with distilled water. All flowers were then inoculated by spraying 1.0×10⁶ cfu per mL E. amylovora strain Erwinia amylovora 273. Treatments with 0617-T307 were performed three times on Sep. 7, Oct. 9, and Oct. 19, 2018. Referring to Table 4, all spray treatments of 0617-T307 (Pseudomonas soli) provided 100% control of blossom blight symptom relative to 0% control of distilled water on the flowers of crabapple, suggesting that 0617-T307 is a promising biological control agent for fire blight caused by E. amylovora. The control rates of two other Pseudomonas spp, 0717-T327 (Pseduomonas koreensis) and 0617-T318 (Pseduomonas protegens) were low, with 16.7% and 25%, respectively. In conclusion, among the three Pseudomonas spp. we tested, only 0617-T307 show good control efficiency on fire blight of crabapple. We observed no phytotoxicity.

TABLE 4 Summary of greenhouse infection assay Sep. 7^(th), 2018 Oct. 9^(th,) 2018 Oct. 19^(th), 2018 # of # of Control # of # of control # of # of Control Biocontrol flowers infected rate flowers infected rate flowers infected rate agent treated flowers (%) treated flowers (%) treated flowers (%) Control 8 8 0 16 16 0 18 18 0 0617-T307 3 0 100 9 0 100 10 0 100 0717-T327 6 5 16.7 0617-T318 4 3 25

For the field assay, biological control bacteria (0617-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, 0418-T328; see Table 2) that produce RejuAgro A were applied on the flowers of the apple trees in the orchard on May 5th and May 6th of 2019 (40% and 70% bloom of apple flowers) at the concentration of 5×10⁸ CFU/mL. The bacterial pathogen E. amylovora Eal 10 was inoculated on May 7th (90% bloom), at the concentration of 5×10⁶ CFU/mL. The percentage of diseased flower clusters for water control, streptomycin, 0617-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328 are 32.9%, 13.3%, 16.8%, 18.5%, 16.7%, and 11.8% respectively. Compared with streptomycin, the biocontrol bacteria that produce RejuAgro A have similar or better efficacy on controlling fire blight in the apple orchards.

Example 9. Antifungal Activity of RejuAgro A and B and their Producers on Venturia inaequalis

The fungus Venturia inaqualis that causes apple scab was maintained on PDA agar in the dark at room temperature (˜24° C.). A mixture of conidia and mycelia suspension (in 0.01 M PBS) was harvested from PDA (Potato dextrose agar). Ten μL the conidia and mycelia suspension were dropped onto biocontrol bacteria, RejuAgro A, or RejuAgro A amended plates. The control was PDA plates without the addition of the biocontrol bacteria or RejuAgro A or B. The dishes were incubated at room temperature in the dark and the diameter of each colony of V. inaqualis was checked 7 days later.

When comparing with the control (FIG. 4 ), the selected four biocontrol bacteria strains 0617-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, and 0418-T328 can inhibit can inhibit the growth of V. inaequalis on PDA plate (FIG. 5 ); RejuAgro A can inhibit the growth of V. inaequalis on the PDA plate at 40-80 μg/mL (FIG. 6 ); However, the inhibitory effect of RejuAgro B on the growth of V. inaequalis was not observed on the PDA plate at 10-80 μg/mL (FIG. 7 ). Finally, no inhibition of V. inaequalis was observed on the PDA plate containing 200-1000 μg/mL copper sulfate (FIG. 8 ).

Example 10. Production of RejuAgro a by Pseudomonas Species

The amounts of RejuAgro A were analyzed by HPLC-MS for the broth after 24 h. fermentation in 4 L flask containing 500 mL YME media at 16° C. and 220 rpm shaking. The amount-peak area curve was prepared for-investigation of the relationship between HPLC peak area and the amount of RejuAgro A (FIG. 9 ). Analytical method: 1) 25 mL cell broth was extracted with 25 mL ethyl acetate; 2) 5 mL ethyl acetate extract was dried and dissolved in 0.1 mL methanol; 3) 4 μL was injected into HPLC-MS.

Seven bacteria (0617-T307, 0917-T305, 0917-T306, 0917-T307, 0118-T319, 0318-T327, 0418-T328) were evaluated for the production of RejuAgro A, the seed medium was prepared by growing the bacteria in YME medium at 16° C., 220 rpm for 24 h. HPLC analysis showed that all the seven bacteria produce RejuAgro A (FIG. 10 ).

Example 11. Formulation and Greenhouse Assay of RejuAgro A

Formulation of RejuAgro A (solution, SL; see Table 5). Before applying to the flowers, 10 μg/mL was tank-mixed with 1% Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 as safener agent. Later tests showed that 0.03% of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as safener agent achieved better protection of flowers. Alligare 90, a surfactant, can be added for increasing the efficacy (Table 6).

TABLE 5 Formulation of RejuAgro-A 1% SL^(a) Component Ratio (%, w/w) Grams Notes RejuAgro-A  1  5 Active ingredient Alligare 90  10  50 Wetting & (Poly(Alkyl spreading agent EO/PO), etc.) Ethyleneglycol/  5  25 Antifreeze propyleneglycol PVA  30 150 Safener Water Balance 270 Carrier (add to 100%) Total 100 500 ^(a)A 1% solution (SL) of RejuAgro A formulation.

To evaluate the biological control activity of RejuAgro A against Erwinia amylovora, greenhouse infection assay on crabapples trees was conducted at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Ten μg/mL was supplemented with 1% Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 or 1% PEG4000 (negative control) were applied on full bloom trees flowers 3 hours prior to the inoculation and 24 hours post-inoculation. Approximately 10⁸ CFU/mL of E. amylovora 110 strain resuspended in water was used as inoculum. The infection rate was calculated at around day 6 post inoculation. The experiments were conducted during the week of Jan. 24-Jan. 31, 2020. RejuAgro A can effectively suppress the blossom blight (Table 6).

TABLE 6 Blossom blight assay of RejuAgro A with 1% PEG 4000 Treatment Infection rate 1% PEG4000 (negative control) 50.8% RejuAgro A with 1% PEG4000 10 μg/mL 12.3% Streptomycin 200 μg/mL  5.7%

Example 12. Antifungal Activity of 0617-T307 Cell Broth Against Botrytis cinerea CA17

The seed of strain 0617-T307 was prepared by growing bacterial cells in YME media at 28° C. and 180 rpm for 24 h. Then 4% (2 mL to 50 mL) was inoculated in to 250 mL flask containing 50 mL M8 (IAA medium) or M9 (CN medium) or M7 (PRN medium) or M6 (DAPG medium) medium and grew at 28° C. and 180 rpm for 48 h. A volume of 0.5 mL of the cell broth was collected at 12 h and 24 h, and was stored in −20° C. freezer. For the antifungal assay, the cell broth was thawed and 5 μL was applied onto the sample wells on a PDA (potato dextrose agar) plate with equal radius distance to the central that is inoculated with the Botrytis cinerea (FIG. 11 ). It showed that the cell broth has antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea CA17 on PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) plates.

Example 13. Antimicrobial Activity of Crude Extracts, RejuAgro A and RejuAgro B Against Plant Pathogenic Bacteria

The metabolites of bacteria 0917-T305, 0318-T327 and 0418-T328 showed good efficacy against R. solanacearum, C. michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis, and X. arboricola pv. Juglandis (Table 7). The bacteria 0917-T305, 0318-T327 and 0418-T328 were grown in YME medium at 16 and 28° C. respectively. The natural product extracts from 0917-T305, 0318-T327 and 0418-T328 were prepared at 5 mg/mL and they were tested against three different plant pathogens: Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. Juglandis by plate diffusion assay. On agar plate diffusion assay, the metabolites of bacteria 0917-T305, 0318-T327 and 0418-T328, grown in YME at 16° C. and 28° C., showed relatively good efficacy against the tested R. solanacearum, C. michiganensis subsp. Michiganensis, and X. arboricola pv. Juglandis (Table 7). This demonstrates that along with RejuAgro A, other metabolites also have good efficacy against Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis and Xanthomonas arboricola pv. Juglandis. RejuAgro B shows good efficacy against Ralstonia solanacearum (Table 7).

TABLE 7 Effects of bacterial crude extracts on the selected pathogenic bacteria in plate assay Bacterial strain X. arboricola R. C. michiganensis Conc. & Medium pv. Juglandis solanacearum subsp. Michiganensis (mg/mL) compounds & Temp Xaj219 Xaj417 K60 Pss Cmm382 Cmm0317 Cmm0690 5 0917-T305 YME 0^(a) 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 crude extract 16° C. 5 0318-T327 YME 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.8 crude extract 28° C. 5 0418-T328 YME 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.7 0.8 0.8 crude extract 28° C. 5 0318-T327 YME 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 crude extract 16° C. 5 0418-T328 YME 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 crude extract 16° C. 5 Vancomycin 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.1 Streptomycin 1.3 1.9 1.5 1.5 2 RejuAgro A 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.5 2 RejuAgro B 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 ^(a)Diameter of the zone of inhibition (cm)

Example 14. Antimicrobial Effect of Rt 18.9, Rt 22.9 and Rt 25.0

The stock bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 0617-T307 was inoculated onto an LB agar (Tryptone, 10 g/L; Yeast extract, 5 g/L; NaCl, 10 g/L; agar, 15 g/L; water) plate and grew at 28° C. incubator for 24 h. The fermentation and crude extracts preparation were performed same as described in Example 6.

The HPLC isolation and purification of the ethyl acetate extracts of acidified cell broth of Pseudomonas sp. 0617-T307 identified two antimicrobial compounds (Rt22.9 and Rt25.0) from flash fraction T5058 and one antimicrobial compound (Rt18.9) from flash fraction T7882. They were tested for their antimicrobial activities on bacterial strains listed in Table 8. Two μL of DMSO, Rt18.9, Rt22.9 or Rt25.0 were spotted on agar plates respectively grown with different bacterial strains and the inhibitory zone was further examined (Table 8).

TABLE 8 Antimicrobial effect of Rt 18.9, Rt 22.9 and Rt 25.0 Rt18.9 Rt22.9 Rt25.0 (5 mg/ (10 mg/ (5 mg/ Medium Strains (related diseases)^(a) DMSO mL) mL) mL) used^(b) Clavibacter michiganensis No Yes Yes Yes LB subsp. michiganensis Cmm 0317 (Tomato canker) Pseudomonas syringae pv. No Yes Yes Yes LB lachrymans 1188-1 (Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits) Xanthomonas axonopodis No Yes No Yes NA pv. citri N40-SO5 (Citrus canker) Erwinia amylovora 1189 No Yes No No LB (Fire blight on apples/ pears) Pectobacterium No Yes No Yes LB carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis 944 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Ralstonia solanacearum No Yes Yes Yes LB K60 (bacterial wilt) Xanthomonas arboricola No Yes No No NA pv. Juglandis 417 (walnut blight) Pseudomonas syringae pv. No Yes Yes Yes LB tomato PT30 (Tomato bacterial speck) Pectobacterium No Yes No No LB atrosepticum 942 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Pectobacterium parmentieri No Yes No No LB UPP163 936 (Produce soft rot in multiple crops) Pseudomonas savastanoi No Yes Yes Yes LB pv. savastanoi (Olive knot) 01-26 Pseudomonas syringae pv No Yes Yes Yes LB syringae 7046 (Bacterial canker or blast (stone and pome fruits) Xanthomonas arboricola No Yes No Yes NA pv. Juglandis 219 (walnut blight) Xanthomonas axonopodis No No No Yes NA pv. citri-Miami XC2002- 00010 (Citrus canker) ^(a)Inhibitory zone was examined between 2 to 5 days after spotted with DMSO, Rt18.9, Rt22.9 or Rt25.0. ^(b)Agar medium plate used for growing the bacteria was either LB Medium (10.0 g/L Tryptone, 5.0 g/L Yeast extract, 10.0 g/L Sodium salt, 15.0 g/L Agar and tap water to final volume 1.0 L) or NA Medium (3.0 g/L Beef extract, 1.0 g/L Yeast extract, 5.0 g/L Polypeptone, 10.0 g/L Sucrose and 15 g/L Agar and tap water to final volume of 1.0 L) Table 14.2 Medium composition of LB and NA agar plates

Example 15. Antimicrobial Effect of RejuAgro A on Mycosphaerella fijiensis

The antimicrobial effect of RejuAgro A on Mycosphaerella fijiensis was examined by adding final concentrations of 60 and 600 μg/mL of HPLC purified RejuAgro A respectively into the PDA agar medium. A 480 μL of 0.5 mg/mL or 5 mg/mL RejuAgro A was added into 3.52 mL of PDA in a well of a 6-well plate to make the final concentration of RejuAgro A at 60 (FIG. 12 , middle well (panel A)) and 600 μg/mL (FIG. 12 , left well (panel B)) respectively. The plate was gently shaken to let the compound dissolved. The 480 μL of water with 3.52 mL of PDA was used as control treatment (FIG. 12 , right well (panel C). After the solidification of the agar, an agar piece grown with M. fijiensis was placed in the middle of the agar surface. A complete inhibition of the growth of M. fijiensis was observed in the treatment of RejuAgro A at the concertation of 600 μg/mL two weeks post-inoculation (FIG. 12 ).

Example 16. Antimicrobial Effect of RejuAgro A on Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzicola (Xon507)

The antimicrobial effect of RejuAgro A on Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xon507) was examined. The X. oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xon507) bacterial suspension (OD₆₀₀=0.3) was sprayed on PSG agar plates. The paper discs, loaded with 50 μL loading volume of the HPLC purified aqueous RejuAgro A at the concentrations of 5.5 μg/mL, 11.1 μg/mL, 22.1 μg/mL, 33.2 μg/mL, 55.4 μg/mL, 110.7 μg/mL respectively, were put on the agar plates and the inhibition zone was measured 44 hours after placing the paper discs on the agar plates. An inhibition was observed at all concentrations of the paper discs soaked with RejuAgro A suspension (Table 9).

TABLE 9 Antimicrobial effect of RejuAgro A on Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xon507). Concentration of Water 5.5 11.1 22.1 33.2 55.4 110.7 RejuAgro A control μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL Inhibition zone 0 0.27 ± 0.5 ± 0.73 ± 0.83 ± 0.93 ± 1.33 ± (cm) 0.06 0.1 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.12

Example 17. Antimicrobial Effect of RejuAgro A on Xanthomonas citri pv. citri citrange (XW19)

The antimicrobial effect of RejuAgro A on Xanthomonas citri pv. citri citrange (W19) was examined. The bacterial suspension (OD₆₀₀=0.3) of X. citri pv. citri citrange (W19) was sprayed on PSG agar plates. The paper discs, loaded with 50 μL loading volume of the HPLC purified aqueous RejuAgro A at the concentrations of 5.5 μg/mL, 11.1 μg/mL, 22.1 μg/mL, 33.2 μg/mL, 55.4 μg/mL, 110.7 μg/mL respectively, were put on the agar plates and the inhibition zone was measured 44 hours after placing the paper discs on the agar plates. An inhibition was observed at the concentrations of 55.37 μg/mL and 110.74 μg/mL of RejuAgro A (Table 10).

TABLE 10 Antimicrobial effect of RejuAgro A on Xanthomonas citri pv. citri citrange (XW19). Concentration of Water 5.5 11.1 22.1 33.2 55.4 110.7 RejuAgro A control μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL μg/mL Inhibition zone 0 0 0 0 0 0.23 ± 0.06 0.27 ± 0.12 (cm)

Example 18. Media Culture Compositions Used in the Examples

Table 11 includes exemplary media compositions used in the Examples.

TABLE 11 Media compositions. Medium pH at No. Name Composition g per liter 25° C. Reference M1 YME Yeast extract  4.0 g NA (Hamamoto, H., Malt extract   10 g et. al. (2015)) Glucose  4.0 g Tap water  1.0 L M6 DAPG Malt extract 15.0 g NA (Gnanamanickam, medium Water Samuel S. (2008)) M7 PRN Glycerol 30.0 g NA (Gnanamanickam, medium K₂HPO₄  3.0 g Samuel S. (2008)) NaCl  5.0 g MgSO₄•7H₂O  0.5 g D-tryptophan 0.61 g M8 IAA D-glucose  5.0 g NA (Gnanamanickam, medium Casamino acids 25.0 g Samuel S. (2008)) MgSO₄•7H₂O  0.3 g K₂HPO₄  1.7 g NaH₂PO₄  2.0 g M9 CN Casamino acids 10.0 g NA (Gavrish, E., et al. Nutrient broth 10.0 g (2008))

Example 19. Bacterial Strains, Natural Products, and References Cited to Same

The bacterial strains and natural products described in this application and presented in the appended claims are well-known in the microbiology literature. These references are presented below in Table 12 for each of the cited bacterial strains and natural products disclosed herein, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

TABLE 12 Bacterial strains, natural products and references cited in support as evidence of their availability. Reference citation Bacterial Strains 0617-T307, Pascual, J., Garcia-López, M., Carmona, C., Sousa, T. da 0917-T305, S., de Pedro, N., Cautain, B., Martin, J., Vicente, F., 0917-T306, Reyes, F., Bills, G. F., & Genilloud, O. (2014). and 0917- Pseudomonas soli sp. nov., a novel producer of T307 xantholysin congeners. Syst Appl Microbiol, 37: 412-416. 0118-T319, Dabboussi, F., Hamze, M., Singer, E., Geoffroy, V., 0318-T327, Meyer, J., & Izard, D. (2002). Pseudomonas mosselii sp. and 0418- nov., a novel species. Int J Syst Bacteriol, 52: 363-376. T328 Natural Products RejuAgro B Knackmuss, H., Medizinische, M., & Chemie, I. (1968). Methyl-substituted 2,3,6-trihydroxypyridines and their oxidation products. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2689: 2679- 2689. Rt22.9 and Loots, D. T., Erasmus, E., & Mienie, L. J. (2005). Rt25.0 Identification of 19 new metabolites induced by abnormal amino acid conjugation in isovaleric acidemia. Clin Chem, 51: 1510-1512. Rt18.9 Osipov, A. M., Metlova, L. P., Baranova, N. V, & Rudakov, E. S. (1978). New derivatives of difuryl: 2,2′-difuryl-5,5′-dicarbinol and 2,2′-difuryl-5,5′- dicarboxylic acid. Ukrainskii Khimicheskii Zhurnal (Russian Edition), 44: 398.

Example 20. Crystal Structure Information of RejuAgro A, RejuAgro B and RejuAgro C

A. Crystal Structure Information of RejuAgro A

Single crystals of RejuAgro A (C₇H₇NO₃S) were obtained by slow evaporation of the chloroform solution of RejuAgro A. Orange tablets were obtained. A suitable crystal was selected and mounted on a SuperNova, Dual, Cu at home/near, Atlas diffractometer. The crystal was kept at 100.05 (10) K during data collection. Using Olex2 (Dolomanov et al. (2009)), the structure was solved with the ShelXS structure solution program using Direct Methods (Sheldrick (2008)) and refined with the ShelXL refinement package (Sheldrick, G. M. (2015)) using Least Squares minimization.

The dataset was collected at 100K with an Oxford SuperNova diffractometer using Cu(Kα) radiation.

Crystal Data for RejuAgro A (C₇H₇NO₃S) (M=185.20 g/mol): monoclinic, space group P2₁/n (no. 14), a=5.30391(6) Å, b=13.97822(13) Å, c=10.74471(13) Å, β=101.5883(12)°, V=780.367(15) Å³, Z=4, T=100.05(10) K, μ(CuKα)=3.429 mm⁻¹, Dcalc=1.576 g/cm³, 13936 reflections measured (10.522°≤2Θ≤140.8°), 1496 unique (R_(int)=0.0220, R_(sigma)=0.0083) which were used in all calculations. The final R₁ was 0.0253 (I >2σ(I)) and wR₂ was 0.0702 (all data).

A refinement model description was created with Olex2, compiled on May 29, 2018 svn.r3508 for OlexSys. Number of restraints—0, number of constraints—unknown. Details: 1. Fixed Uiso: at 1.2 times of: all C(H,H,H,H,H,H) groups; at 1.5 times of: all C(H,H,H) groups; 2. Others: Sof(H6A)=Sof(H6D)=Sof(H6F)=1-FVAR(1); Sof(H6B)=Sof(H6C)=Sof(H6E)=FVAR(1); 3.a Disordered Me refined as rotating group: C6(H6A,H6B,H6C,H6D,H6E,H6F); b. Idealised Me refined as rotating group: C7(H7A,H7B,H7C).

Referring to FIG. 13A, the RejuAgro A molecule has a planar structure—with S-Me group rotated only by 8.7° relative to the heterocycle. There is a notable break of π-conjugation in the molecule at C4-C5 bond (1.531 Å)—apparently, because of some orbital reasons. The Me-group connected to sp² carbon atom is rotationally disordered over 2 positions.

Referring to FIG. 13B, the RejuAgro A molecule in crystal form centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers through N—H . . . O interactions. Further, these dimers form 2-dimensional layers along [−3 0 1] plane via weaker C—H . . . O interactions.

The chemical structure of RejuAgro A is illustrated below:

Additional crystallographic data of the RejuAgro A molecule are presented in Tables 13-21.

TABLE 13 Crystal data and structure refinement for RejuAgro A Identification code RejuAgro A Empirical formula C₇H₇NO₃S Formula weight 185.20 Temperature/K  100.05(10) Crystal system Monoclinic Space group P2₁/n a/Å 5.30391(6) b/Å 13.97822(13) c/Å 10.74471(13) α/° 90 β/° 101.5883(12) γ/° 90 Volume/Å³  780.367(15) Z 4 ρ_(calc)g/cm³ 1.576 μ/mm⁻¹ 3.429 F(000) 384.0 Crystal size/mm³ 0.874 × 0.274 × 0.118 Radiation CuKα (λ = 1.54184) 2Θ range for data collection/° 10.522 to 140.8 Index ranges −6 ≤ h ≤ 6, −17 ≤ k ≤ 17, −13 ≤ 1 ≤ 12 Reflections collected 13936 Independent reflections 1496 [R_(int) = 0.0220, R_(sigma) = 0.0083] Data/restraints/parameters 1496/0/117 Goodness-of-fit on F² 1.067 Final R indexes [I >= 2σ (I)] R₁ = 0.0253, wR₂ = 0.0700 Final R indexes [all data] R₁ = 0.0254, wR₂ = 0.0702 Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å⁻³ 0.33/−0.29

TABLE 14 Fractional Atomic Coordinates (×10⁴) and Equivalent Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro A. Atom X Y z U(eq) S1  6015.2(6)  2181.9(2) 7360.1(3)  14.21(13) O1  2838.4(18)  479.2(7) 5956.1(10) 21.0(2) O2 −1864.8(19)  3816.9(7) 4920.5(10) 20.3(2) O3 −4128.5(19)  2125.4(7) 3998.6(10) 19.1(2) N1  −625(2) 1317.3(8) 5012.2(11) 14.8(2) C1   1795(2) 1257.7(9) 5770.8(12) 14.1(3) C2   3003(2) 2163.2(9) 6326.8(12) 12.9(3) C3   1866(3)  3025.4(10) 6015.7(12) 14.5(3) C4  −699(3)  3073.5(10) 5196.4(12) 14.7(3) C5 −2010(3) 2140.2(9) 4672.1(13) 14.9(3) C6   3049(3)  3965.2(10) 6489.7(14) 19.0(3) C7   7080(3)  978.0(10) 7802.9(13) 17.9(3) U_(eq) is defined as ⅓ of of the trace of the orthogonalised U_(IJ) tensor.

TABLE 15 Anisotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro A. The Anisotropic displacement factor exponent takes the form: −2π²(h²a*²U₁₁ + 2hka*b*U₁₂ + . . . ]. Atom U₁₁ U₂₂ U₃₃ U₂₃ U₁₃ U₁₂ S1 12.06(19) 13.72(19) 14.8(2) −0.65(11) −2.16(13) −1.00(10) O1 18.6(5) 11.9(5) 27.2(5) −1.4(4) −7.8(4)  1.5(4) O2 20.2(5) 15.0(5) 24.3(5)  2.8(4)  1.0(4)  4.3(4) O3 13.9(5) 22.2(5) 18.4(5)  0.8(4) −3.7(4)  2.2(4) N1 13.8(6) 11.8(5) 16.4(6) −1.3(4) −2.8(4) −1.4(4) C1 13.7(6) 14.9(7) 12.8(6)  1.0(5)  0.3(5)  0.2(5) C2 11.8(6) 15.1(7) 11.3(6) −0.5(5)  1.1(5) −0.6(5) C3 15.4(6) 14.5(6) 13.4(6) −0.4(5)  2.6(5) −0.6(5) C4 16.1(6) 14.9(6) 13.4(6)  1.7(5)  3.3(5)  2.3(5) C5 14.9(6) 16.3(7) 13.1(6)  1.4(5)  1.9(5)  1.3(5) C6 20.7(7) 12.3(6) 21.9(7) −0.9(5) −0.8(5)  0.7(5) C7 15.9(6) 16.6(6) 18.3(7)  2.0(5) −3.1(5)  2.0(5)

TABLE 16 Bond Lengths for RejuAgro A. Atom Atom Length/Å Atom Atom Length/Å S1 C2 1.7529(13) N1 C5 1.3742(17) S1 C7 1.8082(14) C1 C2 1.4886(17) O1 C1 1.2190(16) C2 C3 1.3593(18) O2 C4 1.2150(17) C3 C4 1.4658(18) O3 C5 1.2083(18) C3 C6 1.5002(18) N1 C1 1.3778(17) C4 C5 1.5314(18)

TABLE 17 Bond Angles for RejuAgro A. Atom Atom Atom Angle/° Atom Atom Atom Angle/° C2 S1 C7 110.46(6)  C2 C3 C6 123.92(12) C5 N1 C1 126.34(12) C4 C3 C6 116.00(12) O1 C1 N1 119.28(12) O2 C4 C3 123.44(12) O1 C1 C2 123.28(12) O2 C4 C5 117.88(12) N1 C1 C2 117.44(11) C3 C4 C5 118.68(11) C1 C2 S1 122.08(9)  O3 C5 N1 121.87(12) C3 C2 S1 116.47(10) O3 C5 C4 122.26(12) C3 C2 C1 121.41(12) N1 C5 C4 115.87(12) C2 C3 C4 120.06(12)

TABLE 18 Hydrogen Bonds for RejuAgro A. D H A d(D—H)/Å d(H—A)/Å d(D—A)/Å D—H—A/° N1 H1 O1¹ 0.845(18) 2.032(19) 2.8768(15) 178.8(17) C7 H7C O2² 0.98 2.58 3.5549(16) 175.3 ¹−X, −Y, 1 − Z; ²3/2 + X, ½ − Y, ½ + Z

TABLE 19 Torsion Angles for RejuAgro A. A B C D Angle/° A B C D Angle/° S1 C2 C3 C4 −177.63(9)    C1 C2 C3 C6 −176.67(12)   S1 C2 C3 C6  0.76(18) C2 C3 C4 O2 177.16(13)  O1 C1 C2 S1 −2.63(19) C2 C3 C4 C5 −1.90(19) O1 C1 C2 C3 174.66(13)  C3 C4 C5 O3 179.49(12)  O2 C4 C5 O3  0.4(2) C3 C4 C5 N1 −0.66(18) O2 C4 C5 N1 −179.77(11)   C5 N1 C1 O1 −177.26(13)   N1 C1 C2 S1 177.32(9)   C5 N1 C1 C2  2.78(19) N1 C1 C2 C3  5.39(19) C6 C3 C4 O2 −1.36(19) C1 N1 C5 O3 179.92(13)  C6 C3 C4 C5 179.58(11)  C1 N1 C5 C4  0.07(19) C7 S1 C2 C1 −8.68(13) C1 C2 C3 C4  4.9(2) C7 S1 C2 C3 173.90(10) 

TABLE 20 Hydrogen Atom Coordinates (Å × 10⁴) and Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro A. Atom X y z U(eq) H1 −1260(30) 789(13) 4721(17) 20(4) H6A 2408.52 4468.05 5871.25 23 H6B 4925.78 3921.96 6602.43 23 H6C 2587.06 4119.49 7305.04 23 H6D 4205.71 3871.61 7314.56 23 H6E 1688.46 4417.71 6583.38 23 H6F 4027.18 4220.17 5880.78 23 H7A 7306.25 625.34 7044.62 27 H7B 5790.31 654.5 8190.27 27 H7C 8721.96 1001.76 8413.78 27

TABLE 21 Occupancy for RejuAgro A. Atom Occupancy Atom Occupancy Atom Occupancy H6A 0.485(15) H6B 0.515(15) H6C 0.515(15) H6D 0.485(15) H6E 0.515(15) H6F 0.485(15) B. Crystal Structure Information of RejuAgro B.

Single crystals of RejuAgro B (C₁₂H₈N₂O₆) were obtained by slow evaporation of the methanol solution of RejuAgro B. Orange pyramids were obtained. A suitable crystal was selected and mounted on a SuperNova, Dual, Cu at home/near, Atlas diffractometer. The crystal was kept at 100.05(10) K during data collection. Using Olex2 (Dolomanov et al. (2009)), the structure was solved with the ShelXS structure solution program using Direct Methods (Sheldrick (2008)) and refined with the ShelXL refinement package (Sheldrick (2015)) using Least Squares minimization.

The dataset was collected at 100K with an Oxford SuperNova diffractometer using Cu(Kα) radiation.

Crystal Data for RejuAgro B (C₁₂H₈N₂O₆) (M=276.20 g/mol): triclinic, space group P-1 (no. 2), a=7.0528(3) Å, b=11.7911(5) Å, c=14.6888(6) Å, α=72.249(4)°, β=79.265(3)°, γ=86.633(3)°, V=1143.02(8) Å³, Z=4, T=100.05(10) K, μ(CuKα)=1.139 mm⁻¹, Dcalc=1.605 g/cm³, 15292 reflections measured (7.872°≤2Θ≤141.144°), 4304 unique (R_(int)=0.0258, R_(sigma)=0.0234) which were used in all calculations. The final R₁ was 0.0419 (I>2σ(I)) and wR₂ was 0.1124 (all data).

A refinement model description was created with Olex2, compiled on May 29, 2018 svn.r3508 for OlexSys. Number of restraints—0, number of constraints—unknown. Details are as follows: 1. Fixed Uiso; At 1.2 times of: all N(H) groups; at 1.5 times of: all C(H,H,H) groups; 2.a Aromatic/amide H refined with riding coordinates: N1(H1), N2(H2), N1A(H1A), N2A(H2A); 2.b Idealised Me refined as rotating group: C6(H6A,H6B,H6C), C12(H12A,H12B,H12C), C6A(H6AC,H6AA,H6AB), Cl2A(H12D,H12E,H12F).

Referring to FIG. 14A, the RejuAgro B crystal contains two symmetrically independent RejuAgro B molecules. Each molecule has a twisted structure—with dihedral angle between mean planes of the linked heterocycles of 70.3 and 80.6°. There is a notable break of π-conjugation in each heterocycle at C(sp²)-C(sp²) bond between two adjacent carbonyl groups (the bond lengths are in the 1.534-1.539 Å range)—apparently, because of some orbital reasons.

Referring to FIG. 14B, the RejuAgro B molecules in crystal form centrosymmetric H-bonded dimers through N—H . . . O interactions. These dimers are linked in stacks along x direction by other N—H . . . O interactions, Finally, the stacks are linked by third kind of N—H . . . O interactions into layers along [011].

The chemical structure of RejuAgro B is illustrated below:

Additional crystallographic data of the RejuAgro B molecule are presented in Tables 22-29.

TABLE 22 Crystal data and structure refinement for RejuAgro B. Identification code RejuAgro B Empirical formula C₁₂H₈N₂O₆ Formula weight 276.20 Temperature/K  100.05(10) Crystal system triclinic Space group P-1 a/Å  7.0528(3) b/Å 11.7911(5) c/Å 14.6888(6) α/°  72.249(4) β/°  79.265(3) γ/°  86.633(3) Volume/Å³ 1143.02(8) Z 4 ρ_(calc)g/cm³ 1.605 μ/mm⁻¹ 1.139 F(000) 568.0 Crystal size/mm³ 0.3 × 0.22 × 0.2 Radiation CuKα (λ = 1.54184) 2Θ range for data collection/° 7.872 to 141.144 Index ranges −8 ≤ h ≤ 8, −12 ≤ k ≤ 14, −17 ≤ 1 ≤ 17 Reflections collected 15292 Independent reflections 4304 [R_(int) = 0.0258, R_(sigma) = 0.0234] Data/restraints/parameters 4304/0/365 Goodness-of-fit on F² 1.044 Final R indexes [I >= 2σ (I)] R₁ = 0.0419, wR₂ = 0.1043 Final R indexes [all data] R₁ = 0.0517, wR₂ = 0.1124 Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å⁻³ 0.31/−0.25

TABLE 23 Fractional Atomic Coordinates (×10⁴) and Equivalent Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro B. Atom x y z U(eq) O1 2961(2) 7383.5(12) 2001.1(11) 31.9(3) O2 −1826(2)   9293.7(13)  432.4(11) 35.5(4) O3 −3044(2)   7134.9(13)  421.6(10) 34.1(3) O4  182(2) 5943.5(11) 3820.2(9)  24.6(3) O5 3410(2) 2456.2(11) 4624.7(9)  27.0(3) O6 4494(2) 2636.3(12) 2701.7(10) 31.2(3) N1  593(2) 8361.8(14) 1206.5(12) 25.6(4) N2 1809(2) 4204.9(13) 4225.8(11) 22.5(3) C1 1436(3) 5154.4(16) 2526.1(12) 19.3(4) C2 1083(3) 5152.6(16) 3557.2(13) 20.0(4) C3 2860(3) 3281.2(16) 4009.9(13) 21.6(4) C4 3360(3) 3353.0(16) 2929.1(13) 22.3(4) C5 2479(3) 4308.1(16) 2217.5(13) 21.0(4) C6 2868(3) 4264.1(17) 1193.1(13) 27.0(4) C7  537(3) 6175.3(16) 1875.4(12) 19.6(4) C8 1477(3) 7336.7(16) 1708.5(13) 22.7(4) C9 −1015(3)   8384.0(17)  814.7(13) 25.8(4) C10 −1777(3)   7166.6(18)  869.1(13) 24.7(4) C11  −992(3)   6069.0(16) 1488.2(13) 22.5(4) C12 −2025(3)   4934.9(19) 1648.0(16) 33.7(5) O1A 3249(2) 2542.2(12) 7353.0(10) 29.1(3) O2A 6867(2) 4284.9(12) 4433.3(10) 33.3(3) O3A 8705(2) 2165.5(13) 4475.5(11) 36.7(4) O4A 7213(2)  37.3(12) 8198.9(10) 30.6(3) O5A 2666(2) −2784.5(13)   9706.4(10) 36.6(4) O6A  580(2) −1850.3(14)   8272.4(12) 42.8(4) N1A 5218(2) 3432.4(14) 5950.6(11) 24.6(4) N2A 4869(2) −1309.3(14)   9003.5(11) 26.3(4) C1A 4443(3)  197.8(16) 7467.5(13) 21.3(4) C2A 5632(3)  −339.4(16)   8237.7(13) 23.9(4) C3A 3220(3) −1884.4(17)   9063.4(14) 27.5(4) C4A 2026(3) −1349.2(18)   8259.8(15) 27.9(4) CSA 2747(3)  −250.9(17)   7474.9(14) 24.8(4) C6A 1500(3)   238(2) 6728.1(15) 33.8(5) C7A 5314(3) 1250.6(16) 6665.8(13) 20.2(4) C8A 4511(3) 2434.0(16) 6711.8(13) 21.9(4) C9A 6479(3) 3408.2(17) 5139.6(14) 25.0(4) C10A 7408(3) 2197.3(17) 5129.5(14) 25.4(4) C11A 6631(3) 1122.0(16) 5922.8(13) 23.0(4) C12A 7343(3)  −57.7(18)   5817.8(15) 30.6(5) U_(eq) is defined as ⅓ of of the trace of the orthogonalised U_(IJ) tensor.

TABLE 24 Anisotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro B. The Anisotropic displacement factor exponent takes the form: −2π²(h²a*²U₁₁ + 2hka*b*U₁₂ + . . . ]. Atom U₁₁ U₂₂ U₃₃ U₂₃ U₁₃ U₁₂ O1 33.5(8) 24.6(7) 37.9(8) −5.9(6) −12.5(6)  −2.0(6)  O2 38.2(8) 25.5(8) 32.6(8)  3.8(6) −4.8(6) 7.4(6) O3 39.2(8) 37.3(8) 28.2(7) −9.7(6) −15.1(6)  8.0(7) O4 34.1(7) 21.0(7) 17.2(6) −5.5(5) −3.2(5) 6.3(6) O5 40.0(8) 19.7(7) 21.1(7) −3.3(5) −11.5(6)  5.2(6) O6 41.1(8) 23.2(7) 25.3(7) −5.6(6) −2.6(6) 10.7(6)  N1 30.1(9) 15.4(8) 28.0(9) −2.9(6) −3.1(7) 0.5(6) N2 34.8(9) 19.1(8) 12.8(7) −4.1(6) −5.5(6) 5.0(7) C1 23.4(9) 17.5(9) 15.2(8) −2.4(7) −3.1(7) −1.0(7)  C2 23.7(9) 17.6(9) 17.2(9) −3.0(7) −3.7(7) −0.5(7)  C3  26.6(10) 17.2(9) 20.6(9) −4.0(7) −5.6(7) −1.3(7)  C4  28.7(10) 16.2(9) 19.8(9) −3.5(7) −2.9(7) 1.3(7) C5 24.8(9) 18.4(9) 17.6(9) −2.8(7) −3.0(7) 0.1(7) C6  37.7(11)  23.1(10) 19.0(9) −6.5(8) −4.0(8) 7.2(8) C7 25.6(9) 18.4(9) 12.8(8) −4.1(7) −0.3(7) 3.2(7) C8  28.1(10) 18.4(9) 19.3(9) −3.6(7) −2.9(7) 2.8(7) C9  30.7(10)  23.1(10) 17.2(9) −0.2(8)  0.7(7) 4.0(8) C10  28.7(10)  29.8(10) 14.7(9) −6.4(8) −3.6(7) 5.9(8) C11  27.1(10) 21.4(9) 17.4(9) −5.2(7) −2.1(7) 3.4(8) C12  36.9(12)  28.6(11)  37.8(12) −7.7(9) −15.5(9)  −1.4(9)  O1A 32.5(8) 26.5(7) 25.4(7) −7.3(6) −0.5(6) 6.2(6) O2A 40.9(8) 21.2(7) 29.3(8)  0.0(6)  2.0(6) −1.0(6)  O3A 39.6(9) 29.7(8) 33.2(8) −7.5(6)  9.6(7) −1.9(6)  O4A 32.5(8) 28.8(8) 30.1(8) −5.3(6) −10.7(6)  0.1(6) O5A 46.2(9) 28.2(8) 25.3(8)  2.1(6)  1.6(6) −0.1(7)  O6A 36.0(9) 34.1(9)  49.6(10)  1.6(7) −7.1(7) −7.7(7)  N1A 31.8(9) 16.0(8) 24.2(8) −5.0(6) −2.8(7) 2.3(6) N2A 34.6(9) 22.7(8) 17.8(8) −1.0(6) −6.1(7) 6.9(7) C1A  27.1(10) 17.8(9) 16.7(9) −4.0(7) −1.4(7) 4.1(7) C2A  30.6(10) 19.3(9) 20.4(9) −4.8(7) −3.9(8) 4.6(8) C3A  32.7(11)  23.7(10)  21.9(10) −6.4(8)  3.9(8) 3.7(8) C4A  27.6(10)  25.1(10)  27.8(10) −6.4(8)  0.4(8) 1.3(8) C5A  28.8(10)  22.0(10) 21.0(9) −4.6(8) −1.3(8) 0.6(8) C6A  30.4(11)  39.5(12)  28.2(11) −3.0(9) −7.5(8) −5.5(9)  C7A 22.8(9) 18.2(9) 19.1(9) −2.7(7) −7.0(7) 0.0(7) C8A 25.6(9) 20.7(9) 18.5(9) −3.5(7) −6.1(7) 1.4(7) C9A  26.2(10)  24.4(10)  22.8(10) −4.9(8) −3.2(8) −2.2(8)  C10A  26.5(10)  24.8(10)  23.7(10) −7.3(8) −0.9(8) −2.1(8)  C11A 25.5(9) 20.3(9) 22.7(9) −5.1(7) −5.4(7) −0.1(7)  C12A  33.3(11)  25.6(10)  30.4(11) −9.9(9)  3.0(8) −0.3(8) 

TABLE 25 Bond Lengths for RejuAgro B. Atom Atom Length/Å Atom Atom Length/Å O1 C8 1.213(2) O1A C8A 1.202(2) O2 C9 1.214(2) O2A C9A 1.222(2) O3  C10 1.212(2) O3A  C10A 1.205(2) O4 C2 1.217(2) O4A C2A 1.209(2) O5 C3 1.210(2) O5A C3A 1.213(2) O6 C4 1.208(2) O6A C4A 1.203(3) N1 C8 1.390(2) N1A C8A 1.394(2) N1 C9 1.360(3) N1A C9A 1.354(2) N2 C2 1.388(2) N2A C2A 1.388(2) N2 C3 1.366(2) N2A C3A 1.356(3) C1 C2 1.488(2) C1A C2A 1.496(3) C1 C5 1.344(3) C1A C5A 1.333(3) C1 C7 1.483(2) C1A C7A 1.495(2) C3 C4 1.538(3) C3A C4A 1.534(3) C4 C5 1.480(3) C4A C5A 1.488(3) C5 C6 1.495(3) C5A C6A 1.491(3) C7 C8 1.489(3) C7A C8A 1.491(3) C7  C11 1.338(3) C7A  C11A 1.335(3) C9  C10 1.537(3) C9A  C10A 1.539(3)  C10  C11 1.481(3)  C10A  C11A 1.486(3)  C11  C12 1.494(3)  C11A  C12A 1.493(3)

TABLE 26 Bond Angles for RejuAgro B. Atom Atom Atom Angle/° Atom Atom Atom Angle/° C9 N1 C8 125.07(16) C9A N1A C8A 125.23(16) C3 N2 C2 125.15(15) C3A N2A C2A 125.18(17) C5 C1 C2 122.84(16) C5A C1A C2A 122.52(17) C5 C1 C7 123.43(16) C5A C1A C7A 121.91(17) C7 C1 C2 113.73(15) C7A C1A C2A 115.53(16) O4 C2 N2 120.22(16) O4A C2A N2A 120.41(17) O4 C2 C1 122.04(16) O4A C2A C1A 122.03(17) N2 C2 C1 117.74(15) N2A C2A C1A 117.55(17) O5 C3 N2 122.60(17) O5A C3A N2A 123.6(2) O5 C3 C4 121.02(17) O5A C3A C4A 119.50(19) N2 C3 C4 116.37(15) N2A C3A C4A 116.89(17) O6 C4 C3 117.92(16) O6A C4A C3A 118.93(18) O6 C4 C5 123.19(17) O6A C4A C5A 122.62(19) C5 C4 C3 118.87(16) CSA C4A C3A 118.42(17) C1 C5 C4 118.55(16) C1A C5A C4A 119.10(18) C1 C5 C6 125.01(17) C1A C5A C6A 125.12(18) C4 C5 C6 116.43(16) C4A C5A C6A 115.74(17) C1 C7 C8 113.48(16) C8A C7A C1A 115.80(16) C11 C7 C1 123.39(16) C11A C7A C1A 121.49(17) C11 C7 C8 123.12(17) C11A C7A C8A 122.54(16) O1 C8 N1 121.37(17) O1A C8A N1A 120.00(17) O1 C8 C7 121.04(17) O1A C8A C7A 122.46(17) N1 C8 C7 117.59(17) N1A C8A C7A 117.48(16) O2 C9 N1 123.67(19) O2A C9A N1A 123.12(18) O2 C9 C10 120.36(19) O2A C9A C10A 120.17(17) N1 C9 C10 115.97(16) N1A C9A C10A 116.70(16) O3 C10 C9 118.81(17) O3A C10A C9A 118.60(17) O3 C10 C11 121.85(19) O3A C10A C11A 123.38(18) C11 C10 C9 119.32(17) C11A C10A C9A 118.00(16) C7 C11 C10 117.85(17) C7A C11A C10A 119.31(17) C7 C11 C12 125.55(17) C7A C11A C12A 123.69(17) C10 C11 C12 116.58(17) C10A C11A C12A 116.97(17)

TABLE 27 Hydrogen Bonds for RejuAgro B. D H A d(D—H)/Å d(H—A)/Å d(D—A)/Å D—H—A/° N1 H1 O2¹ 0.88 2.51 3.104(2) 125.1 N1 H1 O4A² 0.88 2.17 2.928(2) 143.6 N2 H2 O4³ 0.88 2.09 2.909(2) 154.7 N1A H1A O2A² 0.88 2.14 2.940(2) 150.8 N2A H2A O3⁴ 0.88 2.08 2.892(2) 153.8 ¹−X, 2 − Y, −Z; ²1 − X, 1 − Y, 1 − Z; ³−X, 1 − Y, 1 −Z; ⁴1 + X, −1 + Y, 1 + Z

TABLE 28 Torsion Angles for RejuAgro B. A B C D Angle/° A B C D Angle/° O2 C9 C10 O3  9.1(3) O2A C9A C10A O3A 10.0(3) O2 C9 C10 C11 −169.03(18)   O2A C9A C10A C11A −169.05(18)   O3 C10 C11 C7 173.21(18)  O3A C10A C11A C7A 173.9(2)  O3 C10 C11 C12 −8.5(3) O3A C10A C11A C12A −8.1(3) O5 C3 C4 O6 −8.1(3) O5A C3A C4A O6A −1.6(3) O5 C3 C4 C5 173.42(17)  O5A C3A C4A C5A −179.46(18)   O6 C4 C5 C1 −171.34(18)   O6A C4A C5A C1A −174.5(2)   O6 C4 C5 C6  7.3(3) O6A C4A C5A C6A  3.5(3) N1 C9 C10 O3 −170.34(17)   N1A C9A C10A O3A −171.13(19)   N1 C9 C10 C11 11.5(2) N1A C9A C10A C11A  9.8(3) N2 C3 C4 O6 170.50(17)  N2A C3A C4A O6A 178.04(19)  N2 C3 C4 C5 −7.9(2) N2A C3A C4A C5A  0.2(3) C1 C7 C8 O1  7.7(3) C1A C7A C8A O1A  0.3(3) C1 C7 C8 N1 −172.31(16)   C1A C7A C8A N1A −176.82(16)   C1 C7 C11 C10 178.53(16)  C1A C7A C11A C10A 178.16(17)  C1 C7 C11 C12  0.4(3) C1A C7A C11A C12A  0.3(3) C2 N2 C3 O5 −177.67(18)   C2A N2A C3A O5A 174.19(19)  C2 N2 C3 C4  3.7(3) C2A N2A C3A C4A −5.5(3) C2 C1 C5 C4 −1.8(3) C2A C1A C5A C4A −1.9(3) C2 C1 C5 C6 179.67(17)  C2A C1A C5A C6A −179.68(19)   C2 C1 C7 C8 70.3(2) C2A C1A C7A C8A −103.24(19)   C2 C1 C7 C11 −108.6(2)   C2A C1A C7A C11A 81.3(2) C3 N2 C2 O4 −179.02(17)   C3A N2A C2A O4A −172.19(18)   C3 N2 C2 C1  1.4(3) C3A N2A C2A C1A  6.9(3) C3 C4 C5 C1  7.0(3) C3A C4A C5A C1A  3.3(3) C3 C4 C5 C6 −174.34(16)   C3A C4A C5A C6A −178.77(18)   C5 C1 C2 O4 177.87(18)  C5A C1A C2A O4A 176.18(19)  C5 C1 C2 N2 −2.6(3) C5A C1A C2A N2A −2.9(3) C5 C1 C7 C8 −109.5(2)   C5A C1A C7A C8A 78.8(2) C5 C1 C7 C11 71.6(3) C5A C1A C7A C11A −96.6(2)  C7 C1 C2 O4 −2.0(3) C7A C1A C2A O4A −1.8(3) C7 C1 C2 N2 177.59(16)  C7A C1A C2A N2A 179.16(16)  C7 C1 C5 C4 178.00(16)  C7A C1A C5A C4A 175.89(17)  C7 C1 C5 C6 −0.5(3) C7A C1A C5A C6A −1.9(3) C8 N1 C9 O2 175.24(18)  C8A N1A C9A O2A 169.92(19)  C8 N1 C9 C10 −5.4(3) C8A N1A C9A C10A −8.9(3) C8 C7 C11 C10 −0.3(3) C8A C7A C11A C10A  3.0(3) C8 C7 C11 C12 −178.45(18)   C8A C7A C11A C12A −174.84(18)   C9 N1 C8 O1 176.67(18)  C9A N1A C8A O1A −172.43(18)   C9 N1 C8 C7 −3.3(3) C9A N1A C8A C7A  4.8(3) C9 C10 C11 C7 −8.7(3) C9A C10A C11A C7A −7.1(3) C9 C10 C11 C12 169.60(17)  C9A C10A C11A C12A 170.89(17)  C11 C7 C8 O1 −173.40(18)   C11A C7A C8A O1A 175.71(19)  C11 C7 C8 N1  6.6(3) C11A C7A C8A N1A −1.4(3)

TABLE 29 Hydrogen Atom Coordinates (Å × 10⁴) and Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro B. Atom x y z U(eq) H1 1115.22 9049.78 1137.02 31 H2 1572.72 4198.81 4837.04 27 H6A 4232.36 4076.12 1013.7 40 H6B 2564.31 5038.79 758.38 40 H6C 2062.97 3648.38 1135.45 40 H12A −1685.96 4670.99 1066.64 51 H12B −3421.18 5067.41 1777.57 51 H12C −1645.33 4322.49 2204.55 51 H1A 4812.5 4134.48 6001.06 30 H2A 5506.16 −1572.03 9488.94 32 H6AC 1266.79 −381.27 6443.7 51 H6AA 2147.29 916.19 6217.2 51 H6AB 266.47 500.23 7032.58 51 H12D 6459.43 −365.46 5507.86 46 H12E 7403.89 −616.99 6460.59 46 H12F 8633.15 35.4 5415.92 46 C. Crystal Structure Information of RejuAgro C

Single crystals of RejuAgro C (C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₇) were obtained by slow evaporation of the methanol solution of RejuAgro B and RejuAgro C. Colorless needles coming along with RejuAgro B were obtained. A suitable crystal was selected and mounted on a SuperNova, Dual, Cu at home/near, Atlas diffractometer. The crystal was kept at 100.05(10) K during data collection. Using Olex2 (Dolomanov et al. (2009)), structure was solved with the olex2.solve structure solution program (Bourhis et al. (2015)) using Charge Flipping and refined with the ShelXL and refined with the ShelXL refinement package (Sheldrick (2015)) using Least Squares minimization.

The dataset was collected at 100K with an Oxford SuperNova diffractometer using Cu(Kα) radiation.

Crystal Data for RejuAgro C (C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₇) (M=276.25 g/mol): triclinic, space group P-1 (no. 2), a=7.0334(4) Å, b=10.2354(7) Å, c=10.4693(7) Å, α=116.426(7)°, β=104.722(5)°, γ=97.680(5)°, V=625.72(8) Å³, Z=2, T=100.00(10) K, μt(CuKα)=1.081 mm⁻¹, Dcalc=1.466 g/cm³, 7480 reflections measured (10.068°≤2Θ≤140.528°), 2353 unique (R_(int)=0.0405, R_(sigma)=0.0373) which were used in all calculations. The final R₁ was 0.0504 (I>2σ(I)) and wR₂ was 0.1388 (all data).

A refinement model description was created with Olex2, compiled on 2018.05.29 svn.r3508 for OlexSys. Number of restraints—0, number of constraints—unknown. Details: 1. Fixed Uiso; at 1.5 times of: all C(H,H,H) groups; 2.a Idealised Me refined as rotating group: C9(H9A,H9B,H9C), C10(H10A,H10B,H10C)

Referring to FIG. 15A, the RejuAgro C molecule has a planar pi-conjugated shape with amide group rotated out of the plane of the rest of the atoms by 42°.

Referring to FIG. 15B, the RejuAgro C molecules in crystal are stacked along x-axis. The stacks are connected into layers along ab plane through H-bonds N—H . . . O. The layers are connected through multiple hydrogen bonds with solvate water molecules (3 mol. eq.) into a 3-dimensional network.

The chemical structure of RejuAgro C is illustrated below:

Additional crystallographic data of the RejuAgro C molecule are presented in Tables 30-37.

TABLE 30 Crystal data and structure refinement for RejuAgro C. Identification code RejuAgro C Empirical formula C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₇ Formula weight 276.25 Temperature/K  100.00(10) Crystal system triclinic Space group P-1 a/Å  7.0334(4) b/Å 10.2354(7) c/Å 10.4693(7) α/° 116.426(7) β/° 104.722(5) γ/°  97.680(5) Volume/Å³  625.72(8) Z 2 ρ_(calc)g/cm³ 1.466 μ/mm⁻¹ 1.081 F(000) 292.0 Crystal size/mm³ 0.461 × 0.063 × 0.021 Radiation CuKα (λ = 1.54184) 2Θ range for data collection/° 10.068 to 140.528 Index ranges −8 ≤ h ≤ 6, −11 ≤ k ≤ 12, −12 ≤ 1 ≤ 12 Reflections collected 7480 Independent reflections 2353 [R_(int) = 0.0405, R_(sigma) = 0.0373] Data/restraints/parameters 2353/0/214 Goodness-of-fit on F² 1.047 Final R indexes [I >= 2σ (I)] R₁ = 0.0504, wR₂ = 0.1270 Final R indexes [all data] R₁ = 0.0622, wR₂ = 0.1388 Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å⁻³ 0.41/−0.27

TABLE 31 Fractional Atomic Coordinates (×10⁴) and Equivalent Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro C. Atom x y z U(eq) O1  999(2) 3453.7(16)  3219.0(16)  25.9(3) O1W 5100(2) 8599(2) 11132.3(18)   30.5(4) O2 5632(2) 8416.1(16)  8638.5(17)  28.9(4) O2W 1123(3) 6910(2) 10264(2)  38.6(4) O3 3742(2) 8669.8(16)  6246.1(17)  28.8(4) O3W  −137(3)   3837.8(19)  7792.6(18)  32.3(4) O4 2491(2) 2183.1(18)  6934.3(18)  31.4(4) N1 2349(3) 6104.7(19)  4717(2) 24.2(4) N2 2874(3)  441(2) 4805(2) 34.3(5) C1 1129(3) 2223(2) 3453(3) 28.0(5) C2 2308(3) 2755(2) 4951(2) 25.9(5) C3 2976(3) 4407(2) 5702(2) 23.6(4) C4 4286(3) 5669(2) 7152(2) 23.7(4) C5 4459(3) 7096(2) 7326(2) 24.7(4) C6 3504(3) 7361(2) 6092(2) 24.9(4) C7 2121(3) 4717(2) 4574(2) 23.4(4) C8 2582(3) 1776(2) 5638(3) 26.6(5) C9   −4(4)    717(3) 2106(3) 32.4(5) C10 5482(3) 5460(3) 8426(2) 29.8(5) U_(eq) is defined as ⅓ of of the trace of the orthogonalised U_(IJ) tensor.

TABLE 32 Anisotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro C. The Anisotropic displacement factor exponent takes the form: −2π²[h²a*²U₁₁ + 2hka*b*U₁₂ + . . . ]. Atom U₁₁ U₂₂ U₃₃ U₂₃ U₁₃ U₁₂ O1 26.2(7) 28.8(8)  26.6(8)  15.3(6) 10.5(6) 12.1(6) O1W 33.2(8) 29.8(9)  28.5(8)  14.4(7) 10.2(7) 11.1(7) O2 33.7(8) 27.5(8)  26.0(8)  13.9(6) 10.5(6)  8.5(6) O2W  37.4(10) 43.6(10) 34.9(9)  18.6(8) 15.5(8) 10.1(8) O3 35.1(8) 28.0(8)  32.5(8)  19.1(7) 15.4(7) 15.1(6) O3W 34.3(8) 42.2(9)  31.9(9)  22.2(8) 16.0(7) 22.5(7) O4 36.4(8) 36.7(8)  35.0(8)  23.6(7) 18.6(7) 19.6(7) N1 26.1(9) 28.6(9)  26.8(9)  17.9(8) 12.0(7) 13.7(7) N2  45.3(12) 36.3(11) 38.6(11) 25.3(9) 23.0(9) 22.9(9) C1  27.0(10) 30.6(11) 36.2(11) 19.6(9) 18.2(9) 13.3(9) C2  24.5(10) 28.7(11) 32.3(11) 17.4(9) 15.0(9) 12.7(8) C3 23.1(9) 28.6(10) 28.4(10) 17.8(9) 13.2(8) 14.4(8) C4  22.7(10) 29.7(10) 25.8(10) 16.4(9) 11.7(8) 12.7(8) C5  22.9(10) 29.4(11) 26.0(10) 14.7(9) 11.8(8) 11.2(8) C6  25.6(10) 30.2(11) 30.7(11) 19.3(9) 16.3(9) 15.7(9) C7  24.1(10) 28.0(10) 26.2(10) 16.1(9) 13.2(8) 13.9(8) C8  23.9(10) 30.7(11) 33.0(11) 19.1(9) 13.5(9) 12.5(8) C9  34.4(12) 30.8(11) 33.5(12)  16.3(10)  13.2(10) 10.5(9) C10  31.7(11) 33.1(11) 28.1(11) 17.7(9)  8.8(9) 14.3(9)

TABLE 33 Bond Lengths for RejuAgro C. Atom Atom Length/Å O1 C1 1.396(3) O1 C7 1.353(3) O2 C5 1.367(3) O3 C6 1.258(3) O4 C8 1.252(3) N1 C6 1.365(3) N1 C7 1.343(3) N2 C8 1.332(3) C1 C2 1.379(3) C1 C9 1.472(3) C2 C3 1.455(3) C2 C8 1.478(3) C3 C4 1.431(3) C3 C7 1.371(3) C4 C5 1.373(3) C4  C10 1.505(3) C5 C6 1.453(3)

TABLE 34 Bond Angles for RejuAgro C. Atom Atom Atom Angle/° Atom Atom Atom Angle/° C7 O1 C1 105.97(16) C5 C4 C10 120.77(19) C7 N1 C6 119.61(17) O2 C5 C4 124.31(18) O1 C1 C9 114.99(19) O2 C5 C6 112.35(18) C2 C1 O1 109.38(19) C4 C5 C6 123.24(19) C2 C1 C9 135.6(2) O3 C6 N1 120.46(18) C1 C2 C3 107.33(18) O3 C6 C5 122.8(2) C1 C2 C8 123.9(2) N1 C6 C5 116.74(18) C3 C2 C8 128.4(2) O1 C7 C3 113.39(18) C4 C3 C2 138.62(19) N1 C7 O1 120.70(17) C7 C3 C2 103.93(19) N1 C7 C3 125.9(2) C7 C3 C4 117.30(19) O4 C8 N2 122.2(2) C3 C4 C10 122.16(18) O4 C8 C2 120.68(18) C5 C4 C3 117.05(18) N2 C8 C2 117.1(2)

TABLE 35 Hydrogen Bonds for RejuAgro C. D H A d(D—H)/Å d(H—A)/Å d(D—A)/Å D—H—A/° O2 H2 O1W 0.94(3) 1.73(3) 2.659(2) 169(3) N2 H2A O3¹ 0.96(3) 1.92(3) 2.863(2) 168(3) N1 H1 O3W² 0.97(4) 1.76(4) 2.723(2) 169(3) O2W H2WA O3W 0.86(4) 2.03(4) 2.866(3) 164(3) N2 H2B O3³ 0.94(3) 2.36(3) 3.057(3) 130(2) O1W H1WA O2⁴ 0.79(4) 2.46(3) 3.080(2) 136(3) O1W H1WA O3⁴ 0.79(4) 2.01(4) 2.727(2) 151(3) O1W H1WB O4⁵ 0.89(4) 1.88(4) 2.770(2) 175(3) O2W H2WB O1W 0.92(5) 1.87(5) 2.767(3) 165(4) O3W H3WA O4 0.85(3) 1.88(3) 2.724(2) 173(3) O3W H3WB O2W⁶ 0.91(4) 1.77(4) 2.677(2) 175(3) ¹+X, −1 + Y, +Z; ²−X, 1 − Y, 1 − Z; ³1 − X, 1 − Y, 1 − Z; ⁴1 − X, 2 − Y, 2 − Z; ⁵1 − X, 1 − Y, 2 − Z; ⁶−X, 1 − Y, 2 − Z

TABLE 36 Torsion Angles for RejuAgro C. A B C D Angle/° A B C D Angle/° O1 C1 C2 C3 −0.6(2) C4 C3 C7 O1 176.52(16) O1 C1 C2 C8 173.11(17)  C4 C3 C7 N1  −2.2(3) O2 C5 C6 O3 −0.5(3) C4 C5 C6 O3 −176.94(18)  O2 C5 C6 N1 178.06(16)  C4 C5 C6 N1   1.6(3) C1 O1 C7 N1 178.17(16)  C6 N1 C7 O1 −179.40(16)  C1 O1 C7 C3 −0.6(2) C6 N1 C7 C3  −0.7(3) C1 C2 C3 C4 −174.7(2)   C7 O1 C1 C2   0.8(2) C1 C2 C3 C7  0.2(2) C7 O1 C1 C9 179.80(16) C1 C2 C8 O4 −136.2(2)   C7 N1 C6 O3 179.69(17) C1 C2 C8 N2 42.2(3) C7 N1 C6 C5   1.1(3) C2 C3 C4 C5 179.1(2)  C7 C3 C4 C5   4.6(3) C2 C3 C4 C10  1.0(4) C7 C3 C4 C10 −173.53(18)  C2 C3 C7 O1  0.3(2) C8 C2 C3 C4  11.9(4) C2 C3 C7 N1 −178.46(18)   C8 C2 C3 C7 −173.13(19)  C3 C2 C8 O4 36.2(3) C9 C1 C2 C3 −179.4(2)  C3 C2 C8 N2 −145.5(2)   C9 C1 C2 C8  −5.7(4) C3 C4 C5 O2 179.50(17)  C10 C4 C5 O2  −2.3(3) C3 C4 C5 C6 −4.5(3) C10 C4 C5 C6 173.71(18)

TABLE 37 Hydrogen Atom Coordinates (Å × 10⁴) and Isotropic Displacement Parameters (Å² × 10³) for RejuAgro C. Atom x y z U(eq) H9A −1263.03 784.93 1500.56 49 H9B −356.49 −12.41 2434.48 49 H9C 851.94 376.04 1484.45 49 H10A 4654.31 5449.72 9047.62 45 H10B 6747.93 6301.33 9062.81 45 H10C 5824.37 4494.45 7996.93 45 H2 5530(40) 8390(30) 9510(30) 39(7)  H2A 2960(40)  −250(30)   5200(30) 43(7)  H1 1690(50) 6240(40) 3870(40) 60(9)  H2WA  840(50) 6070(40) 9430(40) 53(9)  H2B 3190(50)  290(30) 3940(40) 43(7)  H1WA 5240(50) 9470(40) 11680(40)  49(9)  H1WB 5840(60) 8290(40) 11710(40)  66(10) H2WB 2360(80) 7470(50) 10400(50)  91(14) H3WA  770(50) 3390(30) 7570(30) 46(8)  H3WB  −500(60)   3520(40) 8410(50) 67(11)

CITATIONS

-   Adaskaveg J E, Førster H & Wade M L (2010) Effectiveness of     Kasugamycin against Erwinia amylovora and its potential use for     managing fire blight of pear. Plant Disease 95: 448-454. -   Aldwinckle H. S., Bhaskara Reddy M. V., Norelli J. L. (2002)     Evaluation of control of fire blight infection of apple blossoms and     shoots with sar inducers, biological agents, a growth regulator,     copper compounds, and other materials, International Society for     Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium. pp. 325-331. -   Alsohim A. S., Taylor T. B., Barrett G. A., Gallie J., Zhang X. X.,     Altamirano-Junqueira A. E., Johnson L. J., Rainey P. B.,     Jackson R. W. (2014) The biosurfactant viscosin produced by     Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 aids spreading motility and plant     growth promotion. Environ Microbiol 16:2267-81. -   Biondi E., Bazzi C., Vanneste J. L. (2006) Reduction of fire blight     incidence on apple flowers and colonisation of pear shoots in     experimental orchards using Pseudomonas spp. IPV-BO G19 and IPV-BO     3371, International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS),     Leuven, Belgium. pp. 323-328. -   Bourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K.,     Puschmann, H. (2015). The anatomy of a comprehensive constrained,     restrained refinement program for the modern computing     environment—Olex2 dissected Acta Cryst A71:59-75. -   Broggini G. A. L., Duffy B., Holliger E., Scharer H. J., Gessler C.,     Patocchi A. (2005) Detection of the fire blight biocontrol agent     Bacillus subtilis BD170 (Biopro®) in a Swiss apple orchard. Eur J     Plant Pathol 111:93-100. -   Cabrefiga J., Frances J., Montesinos E., Bonaterra A. (2011)     Improvement of fitness and efficacy of a fire blight biocontrol     agent via nutritional enhancement combined with osmoadaptation. Appl     Environ Microbiol 77:3174-81. -   Chen X. H., Scholz R., Borriss M., Junge H., Mogel G., Kunz S.,     Borriss R. (2009) Difficidin and bacilysin produced by     plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in     controlling fire blight disease. J Biotechnol 140:38-44. -   Dabboussi, F., Hamze, M., Singer, E., Geoffroy, V., Meyer, J., &     Izard, D. (2002). Pseudomonas mosselii sp. nov., a novel species.     Int J Syst Bacteriol, 52: 363-376. -   Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J, Howard, J. A. K. &     Puschmann, H. (2009), OLEX2: a complete structure solution,     refinement and analysis program. J Appl Cryst 42:339-341. -   Galasso O., Sponza G., Bazzi C., Vanneste J. L. (2002)     Characterisation of two fluorescent strains of Pseudomonas as     biocontrol agents against fire blight, International Society for     Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium. pp. 299-307. -   García-Valdés E., Lalucat J. (2016) Pseudomonas: Molecular phylogeny     and current taxonomy, in: R. S. Kahlon (Ed.), Pseudomonas: Molecular     and Applied Biology, Springer. -   Gavrish, E., Bollmann, A., Epstein, S., & Lewis, K. (2008). A trap     for in situ cultivation of filamentous actinobacteria. J Microbiol     Methods 72:257-262. -   Gnanamanickam, Samuel S. (Roanoke, Va., U. (2010). Pseudomonas     bacterium (Patent No. 20100093538) -   Guindon S., Gascuel O. (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm     to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol     52:696-704. -   Gwinn K. D. (2018) Chapter 7—Bioactive natural products in plant     disease control, in: R. Atta ur (Ed.), Studies in Natural Products     Chemistry, Elsevier. pp. 229-246. -   Haas D., Défago G. (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens     by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307. -   Hamamoto, H., Urai, M., Ishii, K., Yasukawa, J., Paudel, A., Murai,     M., Kaji, T., Kuranaga, T., Hamase, K., Katsu, T., Su, J., Adachi,     T., Uchida, R., Tomoda, H., Yamada, M., Souma, M., Kurihara, H.,     Inoue, M., & Sekimizu, K. (2015). Lysocin e is a new antibiotic that     targets menaquinone in the bacterial membrane. Nat Chem Biol     11:127-133. -   Johnson K. B. S. V. O. (2000) Biological control of fire blight,     in: e. J. L. Vanneste (Ed.), Fire Blight: the Disease and its     Causative Agent, Erwinia amylovora, CABI Publishing, Wallingford,     UK. pp. 319-338. -   Knackmuss, H., Medizinische, M., & Chemie, I. (1968).     Methyl-substituted 2,3,6-trihydroxypyridines and their oxidation     products. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2689: 2679-2689. -   Kunz S., Schmitt A., Haug P. (2011) Development of strategies for     fire blight control in organic fruit growing, International Society     for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium. pp. 431-436. -   Laux P., Wesche, J., Zeller, W. (2003) Field experiments on     biological control of fire blight by bacterial antagonists. J. Plant     Disease Prot. 110:401-407. -   Li W., Rokni-Zadeh H., De Vleeschouwer M., Ghequire M. G., Sinnaeve     D., Xie G. L., Rozenski J., Madder A., Martins J. C., De     Mot R. (2013) The antimicrobial compound xantholysin defines a new     group of Pseudomonas cyclic lipopeptides. PLoS One 8:e62946. -   Lindow S. E., McGourty G., Elkins R. (1996) Interactions of     antibiotics with Pseudomonas fluorescens strain A506 in the control     of fire blight and frost injury to pear. Phytopathology 86:841-848. -   Loots, D. T., Erasmus, E., & Mienie, L. J. (2005). Identification of     19 new metabolites induced by abnormal amino acid conjugation in     isovaleric acidemia. Clin Chem, 51: 1510-1512. -   Masschelein J., Jenner M., Challis G. L. (2017) Antibiotics from     Gram-negative bacteria: a comprehensive overview and selected     biosynthetic highlights. Nat Prod Rep 34:712-783. -   Mikiciński A., Pulawska J., Molzhigitova A., Sobiczewski P. (2020)     Bacterial species recognized for the first time for its biocontrol     activity against fire blight (Erwinia amylovora). Eur J Plant     Pathol. 156:257-272. -   Mikiciński A. S., P.; Berczyński. S. (2008) Selection of bacteria     from epiphytic populations on apple trees and soil environment for     ability to control fire blight (Erwinia amylovora). Phytopathol.     Pol. 47:43-55. -   Norelli J. L., Jones A. L., Aldwinckle H. S. (2003) Fire blight     management in the twenty-first century—Using new technologies that     enhance host resistance in apple. Plant Disease 87:756-765. -   Osipov, A. M., Metlova, L. P., Baranova, N. V, & Rudakov, E. S.     (1978). New derivatives of difuryl: 2,2′-difuryl-5,5′-dicarbinol and     2,2′-difuryl-5,5′-dicarboxylic acid. Ukrainskii Khimicheskii Zhurnal     (Russian Edition), 44: 398. -   Pascual, J., Garcia-López, M., Carmona, C., Sousa, T. da S., de     Pedro, N., Cautain, B., Martin, J., Vicente, F., Reyes, F.,     Bills, G. F., & Genilloud, O. (2014). Pseudomonas soli sp. nov., a     novel producer of xantholysin congeners. Syst Appl Microbiol, 37:     412-416. -   Paulin J. P. (1978) Biological control of fire blight: Preliminary     experiments, Proceedings of the 2 International Conference Plant     Pathogenic Bacteria. pp. 525. -   Peix A., Ramirez-Bahena M.-H., Velázquez E. (2018) The current     status on the taxonomy of Pseudomonas revisited: An update. Infect     Genet Evol. 57:106-116. -   Pujol M, Badosa E, Manceau C & Montesinos E (2006) Assessment of the     environmental fate of the biological control agent of fire blight,     Pseudomonas fluorescens EPS62e, on apple by culture and real-time     PCR methods. Appl Environ Microb 72: 2421-2427. -   Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). A short history of SHELX Acta Cryst.     A64:112-122. -   Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL     Acta Cryst. C71:3-8. -   Stockwell V. O. D. B. (2012) Use of antibiotics in plant     agriculture. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int Epiz. 31:199-210. -   Thomson S. V. S. M. N., Moller W. J., Reil W. O. (1976) Efficacy of     bactericides and saprophytic bacteria in reducing colonization and     infection of pear flowers by Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology     66:1457-1459. -   Tianna D. K., Johnson; Rachel, Elkins; Tim, Smith; David,     Granatstein. (2018) Organic Fire Blight Management in the Western     U.S.—eXtension, Organic agriculture. -   Vrancken K., Holtappels M., Schoofs H., Deckers T., Valcke R. (2013)     Pathogenicity and infection strategies of the fire blight pathogen     Erwinia amylovora in Rosaceae: state of the art. Microbiology     159:823-32. -   Wilson M., Epton H. A. S., Sigee D.C. (1992) Biological-control of     fire blight of Hawthorn (Crataegus-Monogyna) with fluorescent     Pseudomonas spp under protected conditions. Journal of     Phytopathology-Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 136:16-26.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All literature, publications, patents, patent applications, and related material cited here are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of controlling a bacterial crop disease, comprising the steps of (i) producing an agricultural composition comprising: (a) a bacterial fermentate produced from a Pseudomonas bacteria selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126796), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T305 (Accession No. PTA-126797), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T306 (Accession No. PTA-126798), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126799), Pseudomonas mosselii 0118-T319 (Accession No. PTA-126800), Pseudomonas mosselii 0318-T327 (Accession No. PTA-126801), and Pseudomonas mosselii 0418-T328 (Accession No. PTA-126802); or a protective supernatant derived therefrom; or (b) an agriculture composition comprising at least one of Formula (I) or Formula (II):

and (ii) applying said agricultural composition a crop to inhibit the growth of a pathogenic microorganism.
 2. The method of 1, wherein the crop disease is selected from the group consisting of Black sigatoka, Grey mould, Fire blight, Citrus canker, soft rot, Olive knot, Tomato bacterial speck, Bacterial canker or blast, Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits, Bacterial Spot of Peach, Tomato bacterial spot, walnut blight, bacterial wilt, Tomato canker, Potato late blight, apple scab, bacterial leaf blight, and bacterial leaf streak.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri.
 4. The method according to any of claims 1-3, wherein the crop is selected from the group consisting of bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae including carrots, potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes and cucurbits, peppers and green peppers, olives, stone and pome fruit plants including olives, peaches, and walnuts.
 5. A method of controlling a bacterial crop disease, comprising: applying an agricultural composition comprising between about 1.0×10⁵ and 1.0×10⁹ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria to a crop to inhibit the growth of a pathogenic microorganism, wherein the Pseudomonas bacteria is selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas soli and Pseudomonas mosselii.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the Pseudomonas bacteria is selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126796), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T305 (Accession No. PTA-126797), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T306 (Accession No. PTA-126798), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126799), Pseudomonas mosselii 0118-T319 (Accession No. PTA-126800), Pseudomonas mosselii 0318-T327 (Accession No. PTA-126801), and Pseudomonas mosselii 0418-T328 (Accession No. PTA-126802).
 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the composition comprises between about 5.0×10⁷ and 2.0×10⁸ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria.
 8. The method of claim 5, wherein the crop disease is selected from the group consisting of Black sigatoka, Grey mould, Fire blight, Citrus canker, soft rot, Olive knot, Tomato bacterial speck, Bacterial canker or blast, Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits, Bacterial Spot of Peach, Tomato bacterial spot, walnut blight, bacterial wilt, Tomato canker, Potato late blight, apple scab, bacterial leaf blight, and bacterial leaf streak.
 9. The method according to any of claims 5-8, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri.
 10. The method according to any of claims 5-8, wherein the crop is selected from the group consisting of bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, Solanaceae, Cucurbitaceae including carrots, potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes and cucurbits, peppers and green peppers, olives, stone and pome fruit plants including olives, peaches, and walnuts.
 11. A method of a controlling bacterial crop disease, comprising: (i) producing an agricultural composition comprising a bacterial fermentate from Pseudomonas bacteria selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas soli 0617-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126796), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T305 (Accession No. PTA-126797), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T306 (Accession No. PTA-126798), Pseudomonas soli 0917-T307 (Accession No. PTA-126799), Pseudomonas mosselii 0118-T319 (Accession No. PTA-126800), Pseudomonas mosselii 0318-T327 (Accession No. PTA-126801), and Pseudomonas mosselii 0418-T328 (Accession No. PTA-126802), and (ii) applying said agricultural composition to a crop to inhibit the growth of a pathogenic microorganism.
 12. The method of 11, wherein the crop disease is selected from the group consisting of Black sigatoka, Grey mould, Fire blight, Citrus canker, soft rot, Olive knot, Tomato bacterial speck, Bacterial canker or blast, Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits, Bacterial Spot of Peach, Tomato bacterial spot, walnut blight, bacterial wilt, Tomato canker, Potato late blight, apple scab, bacterial leaf blight, and bacterial leaf streak.
 13. The method claim 11, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is a pathogenic E. amylovora being a streptomycin-resistant E. amylovora.
 15. The method according to any of claims 11-14, wherein the crop is selected from the group consisting of bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes, cucurbits, peppers, green peppers, stone fruit, pome fruit, olives, peaches, and walnuts.
 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is selected from Flavobacterium columnare #2 and Flavobacterium columnare MS-FC-4.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is E. coli O157:H7.
 18. The method of claim 11, comprising: applying said agricultural composition comprising between about 1.0×10⁵ and 1.0×10⁹ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria to the crop to inhibit the growth of the pathogenic microorganism.
 19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the agricultural composition comprises between about 5.0×10⁷ and 2.0×10⁸ cfu per mL Pseudomonas bacteria.
 20. A method of controlling a bacterial crop disease, comprising the steps of (i) producing an agricultural composition comprising at least one of Formula (I) or Formula (II):

and (ii) applying said agricultural composition to a crop to inhibit the growth of a pathogenic microorganism.
 21. The method of 20, wherein the bacterial crop disease is selected from the group consisting of Black sigatoka, Grey mould, Fire blight, Citrus canker, soft rot, Olive knot, Tomato bacterial speck, Bacterial canker or blast, Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits, Bacterial Spot of Peach, Tomato bacterial spot, walnut blight, bacterial wilt, Tomato canker, Potato late blight, apple scab, bacterial leaf blight, and bacterial leaf streak.
 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the crop is selected from the group consisting of bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, plant species of Solanaceae, plant species of Cucurbitaceae, carrots, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes, cucurbits, peppers, green peppers, stone fruit, pome fruit, olives, peaches, and walnuts.
 23. The method of claim 20, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasihensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri.
 24. The method of controlling the bacterial crop disease of claim 20, wherein the agricultural composition comprises Formula (I):


25. The method of 24, wherein the bacterial crop disease is selected from the group consisting of Black sigatoka, Grey mould, Fire blight, Citrus canker, soft rot, Olive knot, Tomato bacterial speck, Bacterial canker or blast, Angular Leaf Spot of Cucurbits, Bacterial Spot of Peach, Tomato bacterial spot, walnut blight, bacterial wilt, Tomato canker, Potato late blight, apple scab, bacterial leaf blight, and bacterial leaf streak.
 26. The method of claim 24, wherein the crop is selected from the group consisting of bananas, apples, pears, crabapples, citrus, potatoes, pumpkins, onions, rice, African violets, plant species of Cruciferae, plant species of Solanaceae, plant species of Cucurbitaceae, carrots, tomatoes, eggplants, leafy greens, squashes, cucurbits, peppers, green peppers, stone fruit, pome fruit, olives, peaches, and walnuts.
 27. The method of claim 24, wherein the pathogenic microorganism is selected from the group consisting of Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Botrytis cinereal, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, Pectobacterium parmentieri, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Dickeya dadantii, Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. lachrymans, Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, Ralstonia solanacearum, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, Phytophthora infestans, Venturia inaequalis, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola and Xanthomonas citri pv. citri. 